MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.01.034

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2015

Should routine radiological assessment of anastomotic integrity be performed after oesophagectomy with cervical anastomosis? Best evidence topic (BET).

Jones Christopher M, Heah Rebecca, Clarke Brigette, Griffiths Ewen A

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Rates of anastomotic leak in patients who undergo oesophagectomy with cervical anastomosis formation are reported within the literature to surpass those of patients undergoing thoracic anastomosis formation. Though preferred by a number of surgeons, cervical anastomosis is associated with higher rates of anastomotic leak, the consequences of which can be severe. Routine contrast oesophagograms are therefore utilised in a number of institutions as a means of recognising leaks early. They are not without potential complications, however, and the predictive value of contrast imaging has previously been debated. This best evidence topic reviews the use of contrast oesophagograms in screening for cervical anastamotic leak, concluding that their inherent risk of aspiration combined with poor sensitivity should preclude their use as a screening tool. High rates of specificity nevertheless indicate the potential utility of these studies in patients for whom there is clinical suspicion of a leak.

Для цитирования: Jones Christopher M, Heah Rebecca, Clarke Brigette, Griffiths Ewen A. Should routine radiological assessment of anastomotic integrity be performed after oesophagectomy with cervical anastomosis? Best evidence topic (BET).. International journal of surgery (London, England). 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.01.034.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.