Novel Multidisciplinary Salivary Gland Society (MSGS) Questionnaire: An International Consensus.
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Buchholzer Samanta, Faure Frédéric, Tcheremissinoff Livia, Herrmann François R, Lombardi Tommaso, Ng Siu-Kwan, Lopez Jean-Michel, Borner Urs, Witt Robert L, Irvine Robert, Abboud Olivier, Cernea Claudio R, Ghan Shirish, Matsunobu Takeshi, Ahmad Zahoor, Morton Randall, Anicin Aleksandar, Magdy Emad A, Al Abri Rashid, Konstantinidis Iordanis, Capaccio Pasquale, Klein Hila, Poorten Vincent Vander, Lombardi Davide, Lyons Bernard, Al Rand Hussain, Liao George, Kim Jeong K, Subha Sethu, Su Richard Y-X, Su Chin-Hui, Boselie Franciscus, Andre Raphaël, Seebach Jörg D, Marchal Francis
Аннотация
STUDY DESIGN: The study is a systematic review regarding the evaluation of the existing questionnaire and a cohort study regarding the validation of our new MSGS questionnaire.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Multidisciplinary Salivary Gland Society (MSGS) questionnaire consisting of 20 questions and two scoring systems was developed to quantify symptoms of dry mouth and sialadenitis. Validation of the questionnaire was carried out on 199 patients with salivary pathologies (digestive, nasal, or age-related xerostomia, post radiation therapy, post radioiodine therapy, Sjögren's syndrome, IgG4 disease, recurrent juvenile parotitis, stones, and strictures) and a control group of 66 healthy volunteers. The coherence of the questionnaire's items, its reliability to distinguish patients from healthy volunteers, its comparison with unstimulated sialometry, and the time to fill both versions were assessed.
RESULTS: The novel MSGS questionnaire showed good internal coherence of the items, indicating its pertinence: the scale reliability coefficients amounted to a Cronbach's alpha of 0.92 for Q10 and 0.90 for Q3. The time to complete Q3 and Q10 amounted, respectively, to 5.23 min (±2.3 min) and 5.65 min (±2.64 min) for patients and to 3.94 min (±3.94 min) and 3.75 min (±2.11 min) for healthy volunteers. The difference between Q3 and Q10 was not significant.
CONCLUSION: We present a novel self-administered questionnaire quantifying xerostomia and non-tumoral salivary gland pathologies. We recommend the use of the Q10 version, as its scale type is well known in the literature and it translation for international use will be more accurate. Laryngoscope, 132:322-331, 2022.