DOI 10.1212/wnl.0000000000006167
Persistent geotropic positional nystagmus in unilateral cerebellar lesions.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To determine the prevalence of central lesions in persistent geotropic positional nystagmus, and characteristics and anatomical substrates of the nystagmus in cerebellar lesions.
METHODS
We prospectively recruited 58 patients with persistent geotropic positional nystagmus at the Dizziness Clinic of Pusan National University Hospital. Seven patients with unilateral cerebellar lesions were subjected to analysis of clinical characteristics, oculographic data, and MRI lesions. For comparison, we studied 37 cases of peripheral persistent geotropic positional nystagmus.
RESULTS
The prevalence of central lesions in persistent geotropic positional nystagmus was 12% (7/58). Persistent geotropic positional nystagmus in cerebellar lesions was mostly asymmetrical. Horizontal nystagmus changed in direction during the bow-and-lean test with null positions. All patients showed impaired horizontal smooth pursuit bilaterally, and 3 of them also had positional downbeat nystagmus. The peak intensity and asymmetry of persistent geotropic positional nystagmus did not differ between central and peripheral groups (p > 0.05), while there was a difference in the maxima. Lesion overlays revealed that damage to the cerebellar tonsil was responsible for the generation of persistent geotropic positional nystagmus.
CONCLUSION
Although persistent geotropic positional nystagmus in cerebellar lesions shares the characteristics of nystagmus measures with peripheral cases, accompanying central oculomotor signs can aid in differentiation. In tonsillar lesions, compensatory rotational feedback due to erroneous estimation of the direction of gravity may generate constant horizontal geotropic positional nystagmus.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.