MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/08869634.2020.1721138

Медицинская библиотека · Cranio : the journal of craniomandibular practice · 2020

Three-dimensional study of different skeletal craniofacial patterns from the eighteenth to the twenty-first century in a Portuguese population.

Alves Heloísa, Raposo Rita, Sato Sadao, Slavicek Rudolf

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Objective

To evaluate the most frequent skeletal craniofacial pattern.

Methods

Cone beam computed tomography images were obtained for a sample of 332 skulls from the eighteenth, nineteenth and twentieth centuries. A sample of 150 individuals from the twenty-first century was also included. The different skeletal craniofacial patterns were then classified into subclasses according to Slavicek´s method.

Results

Over the centuries, skeletal Class II malocclusion has been more prevalent, mainly in the nineteenth century. The skeletal Class I subclass neutral maxilla and neutral mandible (N-N) has presented higher values since the nineteenth century (above 60%), and the skeletal Class II subclass prognathic maxilla and neutral mandible (P-N) have been increasing.

Conclusion

In the Portuguese population, the most common skeletal pattern was skeletal Class II malocclusion. From the nineteenth to twenty-first century, there is an increase in the value of skeletal Class I malocclusion, and subclass N-N is undoubtedly the most frequent.

Для цитирования: Alves Heloísa, Raposo Rita, Sato Sadao, Slavicek Rudolf. Three-dimensional study of different skeletal craniofacial patterns from the eighteenth to the twenty-first century in a Portuguese population.. Cranio : the journal of craniomandibular practice. 2020. DOI: 10.1080/08869634.2020.1721138.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.