Evaluation of dynamic testing for pituitary pars intermedia dysfunction diagnosis in donkeys.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Endocrine disorders are common in donkeys. Pituitary pars intermedia dysfunction (PPID) is thought to be a frequent disturbance in donkeys due to their longevity. However, information on PPID dynamic testing in donkeys is lacking.
OBJECTIVES
The objective of this study was to evaluate the previously described guidelines for PPID diagnosis in horses in donkeys with suspicion of PPID.
STUDY
DESIGN
Prospective experimental study.
METHODS
Eighty donkeys were evaluated for PPID suspicion based on clinical signs and baseline adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) concentrations. Six mix-breed donkeys (one jack and five non-pregnant jennies) fulfilling inclusion criteria were subjected to dexamethasone suppression test (DST), thyrotropin-releasing hormone stimulation test (TRH) and combined DST-TRH challenge. Tests were interpreted according to guidelines for PPID diagnosis in horses.
RESULTS
Donkeys fulfilling inclusion criteria were diagnosed with PPID by TRH stimulation test (six of six). Both DST (three of six) and DST-TRH (4/6) challenges failed to detect those animals and showed conflicting results. Similarly, cortisol basal concentrations were not consistent with PPID suspicion.
MAIN LIMITATIONS: Characterisation of seasonal and geographical location effect on baseline ACTH concentrations and response to TRH is compelling in this species. Further studies with a larger number of donkeys are needed.
CONCLUSIONS
This is the first study in donkeys to evaluate common dynamic tests used for PPID diagnosis in horses. Preliminary results agree with the guidelines for PPID diagnosis in horses and baseline ACTH measurement followed by TRH challenge are recommended tests for diagnosis of PPID in donkeys.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.