Which is mightier, the tuning fork or the bone oscillator?

INTRODUCTION

It is important to differentiate cochlear implant candidates with profound sensorineural hearing loss from those with profound mixed hearing loss. The latter include patients with far advanced otosclerosis and chronic otitis media who may be better treated with ossiculoplasty and conventional amplification than with cochlear implantation. Otologists have observed that a dentally placed tuning fork can be heard by some patients whose sensorineural thresholds are beyond the limits of a bone oscillator placed on the mastoid. We hypothesized that tuning forks may be able to deliver a strongerintensity bone-conducted signal than a conventional mastoid-placed oscillator.

OBJECTIVE

To measure the maximum bone-conduction signal intensities of a mastoid-placed bone oscillator and tuning forks placed on the forehead, mastoid, and teeth.

METHOD: The maximum signal intensity of a mastoid-placed bone oscillator and tuning forks at various locations (mastoid, forehead, teeth) was measured using behavioural masking level differences at three frequencies (250, 500, and 1000 Hz).

RESULTS

The peak intensity of a dental bone-conducted tuning fork signal is greater than that delivered by a mastoid-placed bone oscillator (at least 20.5 dB HL at 250 Hz, 16.5 dB HL at 500 Hz, and 8.5 dB HL at 1000 Hz; p <.001) at all three frequencies tested. At some frequencies, the bone oscillator's maximum perceived level is greater than the peak perceived level of the tuning fork when placed on the forehead or mastoid.

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to pure-tone audiometry, all patients being considered for cochlear implantation should be evaluated with maximally vibrating tuning forks applied to the teeth. If the signal is audible, other surgical procedures may need to be considered before proceeding with cochlear implantation.