American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics · 2019
Piezocorticision-assisted orthodontics: Efficiency, safety, and long-term evaluation of the inflammatory process.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Strippoli Julien, Durand Robert, Schmittbuhl Matthieu, Rompré Pierre, Voyer René, Chandad Fatiha, Nishio Clarice
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this work was to compare the duration of treatment between orthodontic treatment combined with piezocorticision (OT-PC) and conventional orthodontic treatment (COT), as well as to evaluate the safety, inflammatory process, periodontal health, and soft tissue healing in the OT-PC group.
METHODS: Twelve patients were included in each group, and their treatment times were compared for preliminary bracket alignment (PBA) and for overall treatment. In the OT-PC group, the inflammatory process was evaluated by quantifying cytokines in the gingival crevicular fluid. A calibrated examiner measured the probing depth (PD), the distance between the gingival margin and the cementoenamel junction (GM-CEJ), and the clinical attachment level (CAL), before and after OT-PC. The presence of gingival scars was evaluated. Bone and root injuries were assessed with the use of cone-beam computed tomography.
RESULTS: The treatment time was significantly reduced in the OT-PC group for PBA in both maxilla (45%; P = 0.001) and mandible (31%; P = 0.023), as well as for overall treatment (52%; P < 0.0001). Although not statistically significant, several inflammatory mediators demonstrated peaks at 3-5 and 16 weeks. There were not significant changes in PD and GM-CEJ after OT-PC treatment, unlike CAL (0.09 ± 0.12 mm; P = 0.024); 47.5% of piezocorticisions caused gingival scars. Only one patient showed no scars. Four cortical bones did not heal completely, and 2 roots had piezoelectric injuries.
CONCLUSION: OT-PC was effective at reducing the orthodontic treatment time.
METHODS: Twelve patients were included in each group, and their treatment times were compared for preliminary bracket alignment (PBA) and for overall treatment. In the OT-PC group, the inflammatory process was evaluated by quantifying cytokines in the gingival crevicular fluid. A calibrated examiner measured the probing depth (PD), the distance between the gingival margin and the cementoenamel junction (GM-CEJ), and the clinical attachment level (CAL), before and after OT-PC. The presence of gingival scars was evaluated. Bone and root injuries were assessed with the use of cone-beam computed tomography.
RESULTS: The treatment time was significantly reduced in the OT-PC group for PBA in both maxilla (45%; P = 0.001) and mandible (31%; P = 0.023), as well as for overall treatment (52%; P < 0.0001). Although not statistically significant, several inflammatory mediators demonstrated peaks at 3-5 and 16 weeks. There were not significant changes in PD and GM-CEJ after OT-PC treatment, unlike CAL (0.09 ± 0.12 mm; P = 0.024); 47.5% of piezocorticisions caused gingival scars. Only one patient showed no scars. Four cortical bones did not heal completely, and 2 roots had piezoelectric injuries.
CONCLUSION: OT-PC was effective at reducing the orthodontic treatment time.