MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ijporl.2013.04.034

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology · 2013

Epithelial salivary gland tumors in children: a twenty-five-year experience of 122 patients.

Fang Qi-Gen, Shi Shuang, Li Zhen-Ning, Zhang Xu, Liu Fa-Yu, Sun Chang-Fu

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate our 25-year experience of pediatric salivary tumors.

METHODS

Patients less than 19 years old with a diagnosis of salivary tumor were identified at Oral-maxillofacial Head and Neck Tumor Center, China Medical University from 1987 to 2011.

RESULTS

122 patients were included in our study, 105 tumors were benign and 17 were malignant. The most common involved site was parotid gland, pleomorphic adenoma represented 91.4% in benign group, and mucoepidermoid carcinoma represented 47.1% in malignant group. All tumors in submandibular gland were benign. Warthin's tumor was diagnosed in one patient. In our follow-up, no regional recurrences occurred in patients without neck dissection. The 5- and 10-year overall survival rates of patients with malignant salivary tumors were 81.8% and 66.7% respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Epithelial salivary tumor was rare, parotid gland was most common involved site, pleomorphic adenoma and mucoepidermoid carcinoma were the most common benign and malignant tumor respectively. The prognosis of patients with malignant salivary tumors was not very favorable.

Для цитирования: Fang Qi-Gen, Shi Shuang, Li Zhen-Ning, Zhang Xu, Liu Fa-Yu, Sun Chang-Fu. Epithelial salivary gland tumors in children: a twenty-five-year experience of 122 patients.. International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2013.04.034.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.