Pediatric dentistry · 2005
Radiographic assessment of primary molar pulpotomies restored with resin-based materials.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Guelmann Marcio, McIlwain Michael F, Primosch Robert E
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to: (1) retrospectively assess the overall performance of formocresol pulpotomies in primary molars when definitively restored with a resin-based material; and (2) compare the results to previously published studies using more traditional restorative techniques (stainless steel crown, amalgam).
METHODS: Records of a 2-operator pediatric dental office using this novel restorative technique were reviewed. Pre- and postoperative radiographs of pulpotomized primary molars restored with Z-100 and with a minimum of 6 months of follow-up were compared to the contralateral nonpulpotomized tooth. Radiographic success was determined by the absence of furcation/periapical osseous radiolucency and internal/external pathologic root resorption. Patient's age, gender, tooth type and arch, follow-up time, ZOE base type used (IRM only or IRM with glass ionomer overlay), and number of surfaces involved were the variables analyzed in the study. Statistical analysis was performed using chi-square analysis.
RESULTS: Fifty-nine teeth in 52 patients met the selection criteria. Patient's age at treatment ranged between 44 and 118 months, with an average follow-up time of 21 months (range = 7 to 43). Significant failure rate was found in the mandibular arch (P = .035). When only the occlusal surface was restored, 100% success was obtained. With proximal restorations, 83% (15/18) success was obtained when the base was IRM followed by glass ionomer and 69% (22/32) success for IRM only (P = .259).
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, restoration of pulpotomized primary molars with resin-based material was inferior to reported success rates using stainless steel crowns. When proximal surfaces were restored, the failure rate (26%) was comparable to amalgam (23%). Prospective studies with larger sample size are necessary for definitive conclusions.
METHODS: Records of a 2-operator pediatric dental office using this novel restorative technique were reviewed. Pre- and postoperative radiographs of pulpotomized primary molars restored with Z-100 and with a minimum of 6 months of follow-up were compared to the contralateral nonpulpotomized tooth. Radiographic success was determined by the absence of furcation/periapical osseous radiolucency and internal/external pathologic root resorption. Patient's age, gender, tooth type and arch, follow-up time, ZOE base type used (IRM only or IRM with glass ionomer overlay), and number of surfaces involved were the variables analyzed in the study. Statistical analysis was performed using chi-square analysis.
RESULTS: Fifty-nine teeth in 52 patients met the selection criteria. Patient's age at treatment ranged between 44 and 118 months, with an average follow-up time of 21 months (range = 7 to 43). Significant failure rate was found in the mandibular arch (P = .035). When only the occlusal surface was restored, 100% success was obtained. With proximal restorations, 83% (15/18) success was obtained when the base was IRM followed by glass ionomer and 69% (22/32) success for IRM only (P = .259).
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, restoration of pulpotomized primary molars with resin-based material was inferior to reported success rates using stainless steel crowns. When proximal surfaces were restored, the failure rate (26%) was comparable to amalgam (23%). Prospective studies with larger sample size are necessary for definitive conclusions.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Chi-Square DistributionChildChild, PreschoolComposite ResinsDental Pulp CappingDental Restoration FailureDental Restoration, PermanentFemaleFormocresolsGlass Ionomer CementsHumansMaleMolarOutcome Assessment, Health CarePulpotomyRadiography, DentalRetrospective StudiesTooth, DeciduousZinc Oxide-Eugenol Cement