MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Hinyokika kiyo. Acta urologica Japonica · 2007

[Clinical study on operative treatment of acute scrotum].

Cho Shuko, Sato Naohide, Furuya Yuzo

Аннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Between July 1986 and March 2006, 102 patients underwent an operation for acute scrotum. Median age was 12.0 years old (range 0-51). Post-operative diagnosis revealed 50 cases (49%) of spermatic cord torsion, 29 cases (28%) of epididymal appendix torsion, and 13 cases (13%) of acute epididymitis. Spermatic cord torsion was most frequent in the age between 0 and 5, and 11 and 20, while epididymal appendix torsion was most frequent between 6 and 10. Moreover, acute epididymitis was most frequently seen in the age over 20. There were no apparent differences in the clinical symptoms such as scrotal pain, scrotal swelling, and abdominal pain. In the physical examinations, pyuria was the only finding to indicate acute epididymitis. In case of spermatic cord torsion, 'golden time' is defined as the time from onset to operation when testicular function can be expected for preservation. In this study golden time was defined as 8 hours because the testes was preserved in all 23 patients receiving the operation within 8 hours, but in only 10 (37%) out of 27 patients receiving the operation after 8 hours. Moreover, the operation within 24 hours saved the testes in approximately 90% of the patients. In patients with acute scrotum, emergency operation should be performed as speedily as possible for preservation of testicular function.

Для цитирования: Cho Shuko, Sato Naohide, Furuya Yuzo. [Clinical study on operative treatment of acute scrotum].. Hinyokika kiyo. Acta urologica Japonica. 2007.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.