MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jse.2025.09.007

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery · 2025

Outcomes of pyrolytic carbon humeral resurfacing hemiarthroplasty compared to best-in-class total shoulder arthroplasty in young patients with osteoarthritis: analysis from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.

McBride Andrew, Hurley Robert, Gill David, Du Peiyao, Duke Phil, Taylor Fraser, Hoy Greg, Page Richard, Ross Mark

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Pyrocarbon hemi-resurfacing and pyrocarbon hemi-arthroplasty is an emerging class of arthroplasty that demonstrates superior survivorship compared with metal hemiarthroplasty and resurfacing. However, it is unknown whether it is a superior option when compared to total shoulder arthroplasty in young patients. We compared the survivorship and reasons for revision between pyrocarbon resurfacing and the best-performing anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty prostheses from a large national arthroplasty registry.

METHODS

The study population included all primary shoulder arthroplasty procedures undertaken for osteoarthritis (OA) in patients aged <65 years and reported to the Registry between September 2004 and December 2022. The cumulative percentage revision (CPR) was determined using Kaplan-Meier estimates of survivorship and hazard ratios (HRs) from Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for age and sex. Two cohort groups were compared: pyrolytic carbon (pyrocarbon) humeral hemi-resurfacing (PHR) and 5 anatomic total shoulder replacement (aTSA) prosthesis combinations with the lowest CPR at 5 years, using polyethylene cemented glenoids and restricted to patients aged <65 years.

RESULTS

A total of 403 PHRs with a mean age of 52.5 years and 1,952 aTSAs with a mean age of 58.6 years were analyzed. Twenty PHRs (5.0%) and 123 aTSAs (6.3%) were revised, with a CPR at 10 years of 7.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.7-12.4) and 9.0% (95% CI 7.4-11), respectively. The PHR and aTSA revision risk did not differ. The predominant reason for revision was implant breakage (35%) for PHR, compared with loosening (33.9%) for aTSA.

CONCLUSION

Pyrocarbon humeral resurfacing arthroplasty has a comparable survivorship in younger patients compared with best-in-class anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.

Для цитирования: McBride Andrew, Hurley Robert, Gill David, Du Peiyao, Duke Phil, Taylor Fraser, Hoy Greg, Page Richard, Ross Mark. Outcomes of pyrolytic carbon humeral resurfacing hemiarthroplasty compared to best-in-class total shoulder arthroplasty in young patients with osteoarthritis: analysis from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.. Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2025.09.007.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.