MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/ijd.16673

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of dermatology · 2023

Distinctive epidemiology and prognosis of de novo and secondary cutaneous angiosarcoma patients.

Ye Junsen, Han Wei, Xu Jin

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Cutaneous angiosarcoma (cAS) is a rare and not well-established malignant neoplasm characterized by dismal prognosis. Treatment for cAS remains controversial.

OBJECTIVE

From 1975 to 2016, a total of 872 patients with cAS (379 secondary cAS [s-cAS] patients and 493 de novo cAS [dn-cAS]) patients were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.

METHODS

Survival analyses were performed utilizing Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards regression models.

RESULTS

Both the number of s-cAS patients and dn-cAS patients climbed steadily over 42 years. There is a gradual increase in the proportion of s-cAS among whole cAS patients for each interval, ranging from 0% to 51.2%.Taking into account a combination of Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods, the survival of s-cAS is similar to dn-cAS. On multivariate analysis, older age, greater tumor size, primary site located at lower extremity, advanced stage, and no surgery were independent prognostic factors of decreased overall survival (OS) in both the s-cAS and dn-cAS groups.

CONCLUSION

Apparent increase in the number of s-cAS patients requires further attention. Surgery is still recommended for the treatment of both s-cAS and dn-cAS patients, and the requirement for treatment improvement is imperative.

Для цитирования: Ye Junsen, Han Wei, Xu Jin. Distinctive epidemiology and prognosis of de novo and secondary cutaneous angiosarcoma patients.. International journal of dermatology. 2023. DOI: 10.1111/ijd.16673.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.