MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s10198-023-01581-y

Медицинская библиотека · The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2023

Cost-effectiveness analysis alongside the inter-B-NHL ritux 2010 trial: rituximab in children and adolescents with B cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Lueza Béranger, Aupérin Anne, Rigaud Charlotte, Gross Thomas G, Pillon Marta, Delgado Rafael F, Uyttebroeck Anne, Amos Burke G A, Zsíros József, Csóka Monika, Simonin Mathieu, Patte Catherine, Minard-Colin Véronique, Bonastre Julia

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

The randomized controlled trial Inter-B-NHL ritux 2010 showed overall survival (OS) benefit and event-free survival (EFS) benefit with the addition of rituximab to standard Lymphomes Malins B (LMB) chemotherapy in children and adolescents with high-risk, mature B cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Our aim was to assess the cost-effectiveness of rituximab-chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in the French setting.

METHODS

We used a decision-analytic semi-Markov model with four health states and 1-month cycles. Resource use was prospectively collected in the Inter-B-NHL ritux 2010 trial (NCT01516580). Transition probabilities were assessed from patient-level data from the trial (n = 328). In the base case analysis, direct medical costs from the French National Insurance Scheme and life-years (LYs) were computed in both arms over a 3-year time horizon. Incremental net monetary benefit and cost-effectiveness acceptability curve were computed through a probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Deterministic sensitivity analysis and several sensitivity analyses on key assumptions were also conducted, including one exploratory analysis with quality-adjusted life years as the health outcome.

RESULTS

OS and EFS benefits shown in the Inter-B-NHL ritux 2010 trial translated into the model by rituximab-chemotherapy being the most effective and also the least expensive strategy over the chemotherapy strategy. The mean difference in LYs between arms was 0.13 [95% CI 0.02; 0.25], and the mean cost difference € - 3 710 [95% CI € - 17,877; € 10,525] in favor of rituximab-chemotherapy group. For a € 50,000 per LY willingness-to-pay threshold, the probability of the rituximab-chemotherapy strategy being cost-effective was 91.1%. All sensitivity analyses confirmed these findings.

CONCLUSION

Adding rituximab to LMB chemotherapy in children and adolescents with high-risk mature B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma is highly cost-effective in France.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01516580.

Для цитирования: Lueza Béranger, Aupérin Anne, Rigaud Charlotte, Gross Thomas G, Pillon Marta, Delgado Rafael F, Uyttebroeck Anne, Amos Burke G A, Zsíros József, Csóka Monika, Simonin Mathieu, Patte Catherine, Minard-Colin Véronique, Bonastre Julia. Cost-effectiveness analysis alongside the inter-B-NHL ritux 2010 trial: rituximab in children and adolescents with B cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.. The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care. 2023. DOI: 10.1007/s10198-023-01581-y.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.