Diseases of the colon and rectum · 2025
Evaluating the Impact of Induction and Consolidation Total Neoadjuvant Therapies Compared to Conventional Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.
СтатьяNetwork Meta-AnalysisСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Cheong Chinock, Kim Na Won, Shim Sung Ryul, Kang Jeonghyun
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Total neoadjuvant therapy has been introduced to enhance oncological outcomes and minimize toxicity in locally advanced rectal cancer, but the superiority between the induction and consolidation of therapy remain unclear.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate oncological and postoperative outcomes by comparing induction chemotherapy and consolidation chemotherapy with conventional chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.
DATA SOURCES: Systematic searches of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases wereperformed for studies published from the database's inception until June 2023.
STUDY SELECTION: The inclusion criteria were patients diagnosed with rectal cancer. Interventions included induction chemotherapy and consolidation chemotherapy, and comparisons were specified as conventional neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were the rates of pathologic or clinical complete response, postoperative results, chemoradiotherapy-related toxicity, and survival outcomes.
RESULTS: Thirty-three studies, encompassing patients from 1991 to 2021, were eligible for analysis. In network meta-analysis, a significantly increased OR for a pathologic complete response was observed in both the induction therapy group at 1.65 (95% credible interval, 1.18-2.30) and the consolidation therapy group at 1.87 (95% credible interval, 1.40-2.47) compared to conventional chemoradiotherapy. However, no difference was observed in complete response rates, postoperative results, or chemoradiotherapy-related toxicity grade 3 or higher between the groups. There were no differences among the groups in local recurrence, distant metastasis, or disease-free survival, whereas the induction group showed a nonsignificant improvement in overall survival.
LIMITATIONS: There was significant heterogeneity among the studies, and the short follow-up period in most studies limited the assessment of long-term survival outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Both induction and consolidation total neoadjuvant therapy increase the pathologic complete response rate in locally advanced rectal cancer without compromising safety or postoperative outcomes. However, total neoadjuvant therapy was not associated with a significant improvement in survival outcomes. Although total neoadjuvant therapy strategies for locally advanced rectal cancer are considered safe, additional long-term studies are needed.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NO: CRD42023445348.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate oncological and postoperative outcomes by comparing induction chemotherapy and consolidation chemotherapy with conventional chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.
DATA SOURCES: Systematic searches of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases wereperformed for studies published from the database's inception until June 2023.
STUDY SELECTION: The inclusion criteria were patients diagnosed with rectal cancer. Interventions included induction chemotherapy and consolidation chemotherapy, and comparisons were specified as conventional neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were the rates of pathologic or clinical complete response, postoperative results, chemoradiotherapy-related toxicity, and survival outcomes.
RESULTS: Thirty-three studies, encompassing patients from 1991 to 2021, were eligible for analysis. In network meta-analysis, a significantly increased OR for a pathologic complete response was observed in both the induction therapy group at 1.65 (95% credible interval, 1.18-2.30) and the consolidation therapy group at 1.87 (95% credible interval, 1.40-2.47) compared to conventional chemoradiotherapy. However, no difference was observed in complete response rates, postoperative results, or chemoradiotherapy-related toxicity grade 3 or higher between the groups. There were no differences among the groups in local recurrence, distant metastasis, or disease-free survival, whereas the induction group showed a nonsignificant improvement in overall survival.
LIMITATIONS: There was significant heterogeneity among the studies, and the short follow-up period in most studies limited the assessment of long-term survival outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Both induction and consolidation total neoadjuvant therapy increase the pathologic complete response rate in locally advanced rectal cancer without compromising safety or postoperative outcomes. However, total neoadjuvant therapy was not associated with a significant improvement in survival outcomes. Although total neoadjuvant therapy strategies for locally advanced rectal cancer are considered safe, additional long-term studies are needed.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NO: CRD42023445348.