Class III Treatment with Skeletal and Dental Anchorage: A Review of Comparative Effects.

OBJECTIVES

This review addresses the comparative effects of skeletal anchored maxillary protraction (MP) versus dental anchored MP.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

The studies retrieved had to have both test and control groups treated by the use of a facemask with or without the use of skeletal anchorage though either (palatal/buccal) maxillary or mandibular miniscrews/miniplates, respectively.

RESULTS

Nine articles were included. Dentoalveolar changes were seen in all the studies. In particular, a significant proclination of the upper incisors was documented in the group treated with a dental anchorage facial mask, as compared to that treated with skeletal anchorage. Comparing the two methods, almost all the studies indicated a greater maxillary advancement in the group treated with skeletal anchorage.

CONCLUSIONS

Therapies with skeletal anchorage produce greater maxillary protraction, reducing undesirable dental effects.