Experience with Stent Placement for Benign Pancreaticobiliary Disorders in Children.
Аннотация
Purpose: There is a lack of experience with stenting for benign pancreaticobiliary disorders in children. Materials and
Methods
Fifteen children (9 male and 6 female) with a median age of 7.1 years (range 0.7-14.2 years) who underwent treatment with a plastic stent for a benign disorder of the pancreaticobiliary system between May 2003 and September 2017 were recruited to this retrospective study.
Results
Biliary and/or pancreatic plastic stents were inserted into 5 patients with congenital, 4 with post-traumatic, and 6 with idiopathic pathologies. Median duration of individual stent placement was 111 days (range 14-1569 days). Eleven children (73%) were treated with one stent only. In 4 cases, up to 22 stents were successively placed over time. There were no complications during stent insertion or stent removal. Seven patients (47%) experienced adverse effects during stenting, including choledocholithiasis, pancreaticolithiasis, cholangitis, acute pancreatitis, stent obstruction, and stent fracture. At follow-up, in 11 cases (73%), the underlying condition was resolved. In 4 children, all of whom suffered from congenital pancreaticobiliary disorders, stent therapy was considered as a temporary treatment before definite surgery.
Conclusions
Patients with congenital anomalies of the pancreaticobiliary tree often require surgery for definitive management. However, temporary stent placement can be accomplished safely and successfully and this serves as a bridge to temporize their obstructive process while awaiting surgical intervention. Children with post-traumatic or idiopathic disorders can frequently be managed definitively by stenting alone and many of these require only one single stent insertion.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.