Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia · 2020
Evaluation of alfaxalone and midazolam with or without flumazenil reversal in Egyptian fruit bats (Rousettus aegyptiacus).
СтатьяRandomized Controlled Trial, VeterinaryНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tuval Avishag, Dror-Maman Inbal, Las Liora, Bdolah-Abram Tali, Shilo-Benjamini Yael
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate alfaxalone-midazolam anesthesia in Egyptian fruit bats (Rousettus aegyptiacus) and the effect of flumazenil administration on recovery time and quality.
STUDY DESIGN: Randomized, blinded, crossover and controlled, experimental trial.
ANIMALS: A total of 10 male Egyptian fruit bats.
METHODS: Bats were anesthetized with alfaxalone (15 mg kg-1) and midazolam (2 mg kg-1) administered subcutaneously. During anesthesia, vital signs, muscle tone and reflexes were monitored every 10 minutes. Flumazenil (0.3 mg kg-1) or saline at an equal volume was administered subcutaneously 60 minutes after anesthetic administration. Time to induction, time to first movement and recovery time (flying) were measured. Quality of induction, anesthesia and recovery were assessed on a 1-3 scale (1, poor; 2, good; 3, excellent).
RESULTS: Time to induction was 4.2 ± 1.9 minutes (mean ± standard deviation), with median quality score of 2 (range, 1-3). Anesthesia quality score was 3 (1-3). During anesthesia, heart rate and respiratory frequency decreased significantly and penis relaxation, indicating muscle tone, increased significantly. Administration of flumazenil significantly reduced mean recovery time compared with saline (10 ± 5 versus 45 ± 17 minutes, respectively), and significantly improved the quality of recovery [2.5 (2-3) versus 1 (1-2), respectively].
CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Alfaxalone-midazolam anesthesia resulted in good induction, muscle relaxation and sufficient anesthesia to perform routine diagnostic and therapeutic procedures for approximately 40 minutes. Reversal of midazolam with flumazenil is recommended, resulting in quicker and better recovery.
STUDY DESIGN: Randomized, blinded, crossover and controlled, experimental trial.
ANIMALS: A total of 10 male Egyptian fruit bats.
METHODS: Bats were anesthetized with alfaxalone (15 mg kg-1) and midazolam (2 mg kg-1) administered subcutaneously. During anesthesia, vital signs, muscle tone and reflexes were monitored every 10 minutes. Flumazenil (0.3 mg kg-1) or saline at an equal volume was administered subcutaneously 60 minutes after anesthetic administration. Time to induction, time to first movement and recovery time (flying) were measured. Quality of induction, anesthesia and recovery were assessed on a 1-3 scale (1, poor; 2, good; 3, excellent).
RESULTS: Time to induction was 4.2 ± 1.9 minutes (mean ± standard deviation), with median quality score of 2 (range, 1-3). Anesthesia quality score was 3 (1-3). During anesthesia, heart rate and respiratory frequency decreased significantly and penis relaxation, indicating muscle tone, increased significantly. Administration of flumazenil significantly reduced mean recovery time compared with saline (10 ± 5 versus 45 ± 17 minutes, respectively), and significantly improved the quality of recovery [2.5 (2-3) versus 1 (1-2), respectively].
CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Alfaxalone-midazolam anesthesia resulted in good induction, muscle relaxation and sufficient anesthesia to perform routine diagnostic and therapeutic procedures for approximately 40 minutes. Reversal of midazolam with flumazenil is recommended, resulting in quicker and better recovery.