Actas urologicas espanolas · 2000
[Subepithelial hemorrhage of renal pelvis (Antopol-Goldman lesion). Report of 4 cases and review of the literature].
Клинический случайАннотация на английскомСтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Villar Pastor C M, López Beltrán A, Alvarez Kindelán J, López Rubio F, Dorado Toro J, Requena Tapia M J
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: The subepithelial hematoma of renal pelvis (Lesion of Antopol-Goldman) is a rare entity that preferably is diagnosed clinically as a neoplasic lesion.
METHODS: We present four new cases of subepithelial hematoma of renal pelvis diagnosed in our hospital from 1989.
RESULTS: Our cases presented clinically with hematuria and flanc pain, preferably in the left side (3 out of 4). After nephrectomy, all the cases showed a subepithelial hematoma of variable extension that can occupy the renal pelvis and calices, associated to hidronefrosis, cortical infartion, renomegaly or renal angioma. Additionally, two of our patients presented with dilation of the pielocalicial system, and a third one presented with urotelial carcinoma of the ureter, being therefore the lesion of Antopol-Goldman an incidental discovery. In the remaining case, the presence of multiple renal hemangiomas was identified as cause of the renal pelvic hematoma.
CONCLUSIONS: The preoperatore diagnosis of the lesion of Antopol-Goldman is difficult although it should be included as differential diagnosis in those cases with hematuria and alterations of renal pelvis in the image techniques, because an early diagnosis could imply a conservative treatment with pieloplastia or partial nephrectomy.
METHODS: We present four new cases of subepithelial hematoma of renal pelvis diagnosed in our hospital from 1989.
RESULTS: Our cases presented clinically with hematuria and flanc pain, preferably in the left side (3 out of 4). After nephrectomy, all the cases showed a subepithelial hematoma of variable extension that can occupy the renal pelvis and calices, associated to hidronefrosis, cortical infartion, renomegaly or renal angioma. Additionally, two of our patients presented with dilation of the pielocalicial system, and a third one presented with urotelial carcinoma of the ureter, being therefore the lesion of Antopol-Goldman an incidental discovery. In the remaining case, the presence of multiple renal hemangiomas was identified as cause of the renal pelvic hematoma.
CONCLUSIONS: The preoperatore diagnosis of the lesion of Antopol-Goldman is difficult although it should be included as differential diagnosis in those cases with hematuria and alterations of renal pelvis in the image techniques, because an early diagnosis could imply a conservative treatment with pieloplastia or partial nephrectomy.