MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/08869634.2017.1393916

Медицинская библиотека · Cranio : the journal of craniomandibular practice · 2017

Electromyographic evaluation in children orthodontically treated for skeletal Class II malocclusion: Comparison of two treatment techniques.

Ortu Eleonora, Pietropaoli Davide, Adib Fray, Masci Chiara, Giannoni Mario, Monaco Annalisa

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To compare the clinical efficacy of two techniques for fabricating a Bimler device by assessing the patient's surface electromyography (sEMG) activity at rest before treatment and six months after treatment.

METHODS

Twenty-four patients undergoing orthodontic treatment were enrolled in the study; 12 formed the test group and wore a Bimler device fabricated with a Myoprint impression using neuromuscular orthodontic technique and 12 formed the control group and were treated by traditional orthodontic technique with a wax bite in protrusion. The "rest" sEMG of each patient was recorded prior to treatment and six months after treatment.

RESULTS

The neuromuscular-designed Bimler device was more comfortable and provided better treatment results than the traditional Bimler device.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that the patient group subjected to neuromuscular orthodontic treatment had a treatment outcome with more relaxed masticatory muscles and better function versus the traditional orthodontic treatment.

Для цитирования: Ortu Eleonora, Pietropaoli Davide, Adib Fray, Masci Chiara, Giannoni Mario, Monaco Annalisa. Electromyographic evaluation in children orthodontically treated for skeletal Class II malocclusion: Comparison of two treatment techniques.. Cranio : the journal of craniomandibular practice. 2017. DOI: 10.1080/08869634.2017.1393916.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.