MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1067/mhn.2002.125605

Медицинская библиотека · Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2002

Ventilation tube removal: does treatment affect perforation closure?

Schwartz Kara M, Orvidas Laura J, Weaver Amy L, Thieling Sarah E

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

The study goal was to determine whether treatment of the tympanic membrane at the time of ventilation tube (VT) removal affects closure of the perforation.

STUDY

DESIGN

We conducted a retrospective chart review and telephone follow-up of children who underwent VT removal from 1995 through 1998.

RESULTS

Among 109 patients (162 ears; 58% male), the mean age at VT removal was 6.7 years. Most VTs (59%) were T-tubes, and most (91%) were removed because of prolonged retention (mean 2.3 years). After VT removal, 111 ears (69%) received treatment, most commonly (44%) with 25% trichloroacetic acid (TCA). At the latest follow-up, 151 of the ears (93%) had healed without additional treatment. Treatment failure occurred more frequently in ears not initially treated with TCA (TCA 3% failure, other treatment 13%, no treatment 8%) and in ears with VTs removed because of otorrhea.

CONCLUSIONS

Most perforations healed. TCA may promote closure, but a large randomized clinical trial is needed to eliminate physician bias.

Для цитирования: Schwartz Kara M, Orvidas Laura J, Weaver Amy L, Thieling Sarah E. Ventilation tube removal: does treatment affect perforation closure?. Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. 2002. DOI: 10.1067/mhn.2002.125605.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.