Journal of surgical oncology · 2010
Medium to long-term results after reconstruction of bone defects at the knee with tumor endoprostheses.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kinkel S, Lehner B, Kleinhans J A, Jakubowitz E, Ewerbeck V, Heisel C
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Limb salvage and reconstruction with tumor endoprostheses is considered as therapeutic standard in the treatment of bone defects at the knee. Few studies report long-term results so far.
METHODS: Seventy-seven patients who had a cementless or cemented MUTARS endoprosthesis implanted were followed-up for a mean period of 46 months (3-128 months). The defects were due to primary tumor lesions in 69 cases or metastases in 8 cases. The distal femur (n = 49) or the proximal tibia (n = 28) was reconstructed predominantly with cementless implants (femur: 69%, tibia: 92%). The resection of the tumor was intraarticular in 46 and extraarticular in 31 patients.
RESULTS: After 10 years probability of limb salvage was 92% with a recurrence rate of 3%. Complications were frequent with a revision rate of 58% and lead to a cumulative probability of survival of the initially implanted prosthesis of 57% after 5 years. Locking mechanism failure (n = 15) and aseptic loosening (n = 13) were the most frequent failure modes.
CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of achieving a low recurrence rate and satisfactory functional results, we found a high complication rate after implantation of a megaprosthesis. This was particularly evident for extraarticular resections and cemented fixation, which should be avoided when possible.
METHODS: Seventy-seven patients who had a cementless or cemented MUTARS endoprosthesis implanted were followed-up for a mean period of 46 months (3-128 months). The defects were due to primary tumor lesions in 69 cases or metastases in 8 cases. The distal femur (n = 49) or the proximal tibia (n = 28) was reconstructed predominantly with cementless implants (femur: 69%, tibia: 92%). The resection of the tumor was intraarticular in 46 and extraarticular in 31 patients.
RESULTS: After 10 years probability of limb salvage was 92% with a recurrence rate of 3%. Complications were frequent with a revision rate of 58% and lead to a cumulative probability of survival of the initially implanted prosthesis of 57% after 5 years. Locking mechanism failure (n = 15) and aseptic loosening (n = 13) were the most frequent failure modes.
CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of achieving a low recurrence rate and satisfactory functional results, we found a high complication rate after implantation of a megaprosthesis. This was particularly evident for extraarticular resections and cemented fixation, which should be avoided when possible.