Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association · 2008
Upper tibia osteotomy: long term results - realignment analysis using OASIS computer software.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Babis George C, An Kai-Nan, Chao Edmund Y S, Larson Dirk R, Rand James A, Sim Franklin H
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The normal values for axial alignment and joint line obliquity of the knee that indicate a successful valgus upper tibial osteotomy have not been established and reported in the literature.
METHODS: To identify those parameters we prospectively followed 51 patients with 54 lateral closing wedge upper tibial osteotomies performed after preoperative and postoperative analysis of standardized hip-to-ankle radiographs with a software computer program (OASIS).
RESULTS: Of the 54 knees, 18 (33.3%) underwent additional surgery. The average follow-up of the remaining 36 knees was 10 years (range 6.9-13.8 years). The cumulative osteotomy survival rate was 89% at 5 years and 76% at 10 years. Compared with patients whose postoperative femorotibial angle was 174 degrees -180 degrees , the patients whose postoperative femorotibial angle was <174 degrees or >180 degrees did worse with respect to osteotomy failure. Ten knees were at a decreased risk of failure. These knees had a postoperative femorotibial angle of 174 degrees -180 degrees , lateral joint line obliquity of <4 degrees , and a medial plateau force distribution of 40%-60%. The knees that met these criteria had 100% survival at 5 and 10 years, whereas the rest of the knees had survival rates of 86% and 70%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: We believe that using these criteria during preoperative planning may improve the survival of upper tibial osteotomy provided a precise, reproducible surgical technique and rigid fixation can be performed.
METHODS: To identify those parameters we prospectively followed 51 patients with 54 lateral closing wedge upper tibial osteotomies performed after preoperative and postoperative analysis of standardized hip-to-ankle radiographs with a software computer program (OASIS).
RESULTS: Of the 54 knees, 18 (33.3%) underwent additional surgery. The average follow-up of the remaining 36 knees was 10 years (range 6.9-13.8 years). The cumulative osteotomy survival rate was 89% at 5 years and 76% at 10 years. Compared with patients whose postoperative femorotibial angle was 174 degrees -180 degrees , the patients whose postoperative femorotibial angle was <174 degrees or >180 degrees did worse with respect to osteotomy failure. Ten knees were at a decreased risk of failure. These knees had a postoperative femorotibial angle of 174 degrees -180 degrees , lateral joint line obliquity of <4 degrees , and a medial plateau force distribution of 40%-60%. The knees that met these criteria had 100% survival at 5 and 10 years, whereas the rest of the knees had survival rates of 86% and 70%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: We believe that using these criteria during preoperative planning may improve the survival of upper tibial osteotomy provided a precise, reproducible surgical technique and rigid fixation can be performed.