MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0714.1993.tb00130.x

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of oral pathology & medicine : official publication of the International Association of Oral Pathologists and the American Academy of Oral Pathology · 1993

Giant cell lesions of the jaws: evaluation of nucleolar organizer regions in lesions of varying behavior.

Whitaker S B, Vigneswaran N, Budnick S D, Waldron C A

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

To examine whether giant cell lesions of the jaws (GCL) of varying behavior could be separated histologically, a number of GCL were studied using the AgNOR staining technique for nucleolar organizer regions. The mean AgNOR count of mononuclear cells from recurrent lesions (1.73 +/- 0.15) was slightly higher than that of the aggressive lesions (1.54 +/- 0.21) and much higher than that of the non-aggressive/non-recurrent lesions (1.33 +/- 0.14). Similarly, the mean AgNOR count of the multinucleate giant cells of the recurrent lesions (1.52 +/- 0.14) was slightly higher than that of aggressive lesions (1.34 +/- 0.092) and much higher than that of non-aggressive/non-recurrent lesions (1.26 +/- 0.05). Statistical analysis showed a significant difference between the mean number of AgNORS of recurrent lesions and non-recurrent/non-aggressive ones in both the mononuclear and multinuclear population (p < 0.05).

Для цитирования: Whitaker S B, Vigneswaran N, Budnick S D, Waldron C A. Giant cell lesions of the jaws: evaluation of nucleolar organizer regions in lesions of varying behavior.. Journal of oral pathology & medicine : official publication of the International Association of Oral Pathologists and the American Academy of Oral Pathology. 1993. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.1993.tb00130.x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.