Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery · 1998
Buccinator musculomucosal flap: applications in intraoral reconstruction.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Licameli G R, Dolan R
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of the buccinator musculomucosal flap in the reconstruction of defects of the oral cavity and oropharynx.
DESIGN: Prospective case series of 8 patients during a 1-year period with an average follow-up of 1 year. Six anatomical dissections were performed on 3 fresh cadaver heads to investigate the neurovascular supply to the flap.
SETTING: Academic tertiary referral medical center.
RESULTS: The buccinator musculomucosal flap was used in the reconstruction of 8 defects of the oral cavity, retromolar trigone, and soft palate. There was 1 partial flap necrosis that occurred in a patient who had previously received radiation therapy and who healed secondarily without sequelae. No patient experienced difficulties with mastication or oral competence. All patients reported light single-point touch sensation over the flap 2 weeks after surgery. Cadaveric dissections using latex or india ink injections demonstrated the posterior neurovascular supply from the buccal artery, a branch of the internal maxillary artery, and the buccal nerve, a branch of the mandibular nerve.
CONCLUSIONS: The buccinator musculomucosal flap is a dependable local sensate flap with a well-defined neurovascular pedicle that can be used in a variety of intraoral reconstructions obviating the need for distal tissue harvest.
DESIGN: Prospective case series of 8 patients during a 1-year period with an average follow-up of 1 year. Six anatomical dissections were performed on 3 fresh cadaver heads to investigate the neurovascular supply to the flap.
SETTING: Academic tertiary referral medical center.
RESULTS: The buccinator musculomucosal flap was used in the reconstruction of 8 defects of the oral cavity, retromolar trigone, and soft palate. There was 1 partial flap necrosis that occurred in a patient who had previously received radiation therapy and who healed secondarily without sequelae. No patient experienced difficulties with mastication or oral competence. All patients reported light single-point touch sensation over the flap 2 weeks after surgery. Cadaveric dissections using latex or india ink injections demonstrated the posterior neurovascular supply from the buccal artery, a branch of the internal maxillary artery, and the buccal nerve, a branch of the mandibular nerve.
CONCLUSIONS: The buccinator musculomucosal flap is a dependable local sensate flap with a well-defined neurovascular pedicle that can be used in a variety of intraoral reconstructions obviating the need for distal tissue harvest.