The Journal of urology · 2004
Nerve injury after laparoscopic varicocelectomy.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chrouser Kristin, Vandersteen David, Crocker Julie, Reinberg Yuri
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Laparoscopic varicocelectomy is a minimally invasive option for varicoceles in children. Occasional reports of nerve injury after inguinal laparoscopic procedures have been published. There is anatomical variation in the sensory innervation of the anterior thigh and variable branching patterns of the nerves involved. We report a retrospective analysis of our patients, focusing on the incidence of sensory changes on the ipsilateral anterior thigh after laparoscopic varicocelectomy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records of all patients who underwent laparoscopic varicocelectomy at 1 institution performed by 2 of us (YR and DV) from 1997 to 2002 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographics, outcomes and any postoperative sensory complications were obtained by chart review and telephone interview.
RESULTS: A total of 58 patients underwent laparoscopic varicocelectomy during this 5-year analysis and 51 with a total of 62 varicoceles were available for review. Three patients (4.8%) experienced transient numbness of the ipsilateral anterior thigh, which resolved or improved in an average of 8.0 months (range 6 to 9). Symptoms were not always noticed immediately postoperatively (range 0 to 10 days). In affected patients the sensory distribution was usually consistent with injury to the genitofemoral nerve.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic varicocelectomy is a minimally invasive procedure that still has the potential for complications. Cautery or harmonic dissection of the peritoneum overlying the spermatic cord and excessive traction on the tissues surrounding the cord should be avoided intraoperatively. Patients and surgeons should be aware of the possibility of nerve injury and the resultant sensory deficit.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records of all patients who underwent laparoscopic varicocelectomy at 1 institution performed by 2 of us (YR and DV) from 1997 to 2002 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographics, outcomes and any postoperative sensory complications were obtained by chart review and telephone interview.
RESULTS: A total of 58 patients underwent laparoscopic varicocelectomy during this 5-year analysis and 51 with a total of 62 varicoceles were available for review. Three patients (4.8%) experienced transient numbness of the ipsilateral anterior thigh, which resolved or improved in an average of 8.0 months (range 6 to 9). Symptoms were not always noticed immediately postoperatively (range 0 to 10 days). In affected patients the sensory distribution was usually consistent with injury to the genitofemoral nerve.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic varicocelectomy is a minimally invasive procedure that still has the potential for complications. Cautery or harmonic dissection of the peritoneum overlying the spermatic cord and excessive traction on the tissues surrounding the cord should be avoided intraoperatively. Patients and surgeons should be aware of the possibility of nerve injury and the resultant sensory deficit.