Archivos espanoles de urologia · 2002
[Paratesticular leiomyosarcoma: report of a new case].
Клинический случайАннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Cruz Guerra Nicolás Alberto, Clemente Ramos Luis, Montáns Araújo José, Linares Quevedo Ana, Pozo Mengual Bernabé, Allona Almagro Antonio
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To report an additional case of paratesticular leiomyosarcoma.
METHODS: Herein we describe a 68-year-old male patient that presented with a growing, indolent, right inguinoscrotal lesion that he had noted several weeks earlier. Physical examination showed a mass involving the distal right spermatic cord and was confirmed by ultrasound and CT. Analyses were normal. Radical orchidectomy with high ligation of the right spermatic cord was performed.
RESULTS: Histopathological and immunohistochemical studies demonstrated a well-differentiated paratesticular leiomyosarcoma. Local recurrence was observed at 3 1/2 years' follow-up. Complete excision of the tumorous tissue was performed with no other adjuvant therapy. Six months thereafter, there is no evidence of local recurrence or distant metastasis.
CONCLUSIONS: This tumor type is uncommon. Like other authors, we believe that orchifuniculectomy is the treatment of choice. Furthermore, adjuvant radio or chemotherapy does not significantly influence survival in these patients.
METHODS: Herein we describe a 68-year-old male patient that presented with a growing, indolent, right inguinoscrotal lesion that he had noted several weeks earlier. Physical examination showed a mass involving the distal right spermatic cord and was confirmed by ultrasound and CT. Analyses were normal. Radical orchidectomy with high ligation of the right spermatic cord was performed.
RESULTS: Histopathological and immunohistochemical studies demonstrated a well-differentiated paratesticular leiomyosarcoma. Local recurrence was observed at 3 1/2 years' follow-up. Complete excision of the tumorous tissue was performed with no other adjuvant therapy. Six months thereafter, there is no evidence of local recurrence or distant metastasis.
CONCLUSIONS: This tumor type is uncommon. Like other authors, we believe that orchifuniculectomy is the treatment of choice. Furthermore, adjuvant radio or chemotherapy does not significantly influence survival in these patients.