Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer · 2025
Neoadjuvant Concurrent Chemo-Immuno-Radiation Therapy Followed by Surgery and Adjuvant Immunotherapy for Resectable Stage III N2 NSCLC: Primary Results From the SQUAT Trial (WJOG 12119L).
Клиническое исследование II фазыСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hamada Akira, Soh Junichi, Hata Akito, Nakamatsu Kiyoshi, Shimokawa Mototsugu, Yatabe Yasushi, Suzuki Jun, Tsuboi Masahiro, Horinouchi Hidehito, Sakairi Yuichi, Tanahashi Masayuki, Toyooka Shinichi, Okada Morihito, Matsuura Natusmi, Shigematsu Hisayuki, Nishimura Yasumasa, Yamamoto Nobuyuki, Nakagawa Kazuhiko, Mitsudomi Tetsuya
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy is one of the standard treatment options for resectable stage II to III NSCLC. Nevertheless, this treatment yielded insufficient local control in the CheckMate 816 trial. We hypothesized that adding radiotherapy could improve local control, thereby improving survival outcomes.
METHODS: Eligible patients had clinical T1 to T3 or T4 (tumor size) N2 stage IIIA to B NSCLC (American Joint Committee on Cancer version 8), pathologically confirmed as N2 without extranodal invasion. Patients received concurrent chemoradiotherapy (carboplatin [area under the curve = 2] and paclitaxel [40 mg/m2] on days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29, with 50 Gy radiation over 25 d) and durvalumab (1500 mg) on days 1 and 29, followed by surgical resection within two to six weeks. After surgery, durvalumab adjuvant therapy was administered for up to one year. The primary endpoint was major pathologic response (MPR: ≤10% viable tumor), with secondary endpoints being pathologic complete response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.
RESULTS: From January 2020 through February 2022, 31 patients were enrolled from 10 Japanese institutions. The MPR rate was 63% (90% confidence interval: 47%-78%), which met the primary endpoint, and the pathologic complete response rate was 23%. At a median follow-up of 28 months, the two-year PFS and OS rates were 43% and 76%, respectively. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in 48% of cases, including one treatment-related death.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with recently published results of peri-operative chemo-immunotherapy trials, this treatment regimen had a higher MPR rate. Nevertheless, this benefit did not necessarily translate into improved PFS or OS.
METHODS: Eligible patients had clinical T1 to T3 or T4 (tumor size) N2 stage IIIA to B NSCLC (American Joint Committee on Cancer version 8), pathologically confirmed as N2 without extranodal invasion. Patients received concurrent chemoradiotherapy (carboplatin [area under the curve = 2] and paclitaxel [40 mg/m2] on days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29, with 50 Gy radiation over 25 d) and durvalumab (1500 mg) on days 1 and 29, followed by surgical resection within two to six weeks. After surgery, durvalumab adjuvant therapy was administered for up to one year. The primary endpoint was major pathologic response (MPR: ≤10% viable tumor), with secondary endpoints being pathologic complete response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.
RESULTS: From January 2020 through February 2022, 31 patients were enrolled from 10 Japanese institutions. The MPR rate was 63% (90% confidence interval: 47%-78%), which met the primary endpoint, and the pathologic complete response rate was 23%. At a median follow-up of 28 months, the two-year PFS and OS rates were 43% and 76%, respectively. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in 48% of cases, including one treatment-related death.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with recently published results of peri-operative chemo-immunotherapy trials, this treatment regimen had a higher MPR rate. Nevertheless, this benefit did not necessarily translate into improved PFS or OS.