Shanghai kou qiang yi xue = Shanghai journal of stomatology · 2016
[Evaluation of the maxillary basal bone and molar change of skeletal Class II malocclusion treated by sagittal-guidance Twin-block].
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yi Ying-Yu, Zhao Ning, Shen Gang
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of sagittal-guidance Twin-block appliance on maxillary basal bone and buccal segment distalization in developing Angle Class II division 1 malocclusion.
METHODS: The measurement data of anterior-posterior direction and vertical dimension between pretherapy and post-treatment, including 34 developing Angle Class II division 1 patients with sagittal-guidance Twin-block and non-extraction treatment, were quantitatively analyzed by X-ray cephalometry and Pancherz. SPSS 20.0 software package was used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: After orthopedic treatment, the maxilla significantly retruded (0.68 mm, P<0.01), the maxillary molars moved posteriorly (1.33 mm, P<0.01). After orthodontic treatment, the maxillary bone still turned out posteriorly (0.65 mm, P<0.05), and the molar teeth were slightly distalized (0.53 mm, P>0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The correction of developing Angle Class II division 1 malocclusion can be achieved by sagittal-guidance Twin-block.
METHODS: The measurement data of anterior-posterior direction and vertical dimension between pretherapy and post-treatment, including 34 developing Angle Class II division 1 patients with sagittal-guidance Twin-block and non-extraction treatment, were quantitatively analyzed by X-ray cephalometry and Pancherz. SPSS 20.0 software package was used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: After orthopedic treatment, the maxilla significantly retruded (0.68 mm, P<0.01), the maxillary molars moved posteriorly (1.33 mm, P<0.01). After orthodontic treatment, the maxillary bone still turned out posteriorly (0.65 mm, P<0.05), and the molar teeth were slightly distalized (0.53 mm, P>0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The correction of developing Angle Class II division 1 malocclusion can be achieved by sagittal-guidance Twin-block.