MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2319/030708-137.1

Медицинская библиотека · The Angle orthodontist · 2009

Posterior crossbite and functional changes. A systematic review.

Andrade Annicele da Silva, Gameiro Gustavo Hauber, Derossi Moara, Gavião Maria Beatriz Duarte

СтатьяСистематический обзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To assess, by systematically reviewing the literature, the functional changes of the masticatory muscles associated with posterior crossbite in the primary and mixed dentition.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

A literature survey from the Medline database covering the period from January 1965 to February 2008 was performed. Randomized controlled trials, controlled clinical trials, and clinical trials that evaluated bite force, surface electromyography, and signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders (TMD) were included. Two reviewers extracted the data independently and assessed the quality of the studies.

RESULTS

The search strategy resulted in 494 articles, of which 8 met the inclusion criteria. Children with posterior crossbite can have reduced bite force and asymmetrical muscle function during chewing or clenching, in which the anterior temporalis is more active and the masseter less active on the crossbite side than the noncrossbite side. Moreover, there is a significant association between posterior crossbite and TMD symptomatology.

CONCLUSION

The consequences of the functional changes for the growth and development of the stomatognathic system deserves further investigation.

Для цитирования: Andrade Annicele da Silva, Gameiro Gustavo Hauber, Derossi Moara, Gavião Maria Beatriz Duarte. Posterior crossbite and functional changes. A systematic review.. The Angle orthodontist. 2009. DOI: 10.2319/030708-137.1.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.