Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy · 2022
Antibacterial efficiency of adjuvant photodynamic therapy and high-power diode laser in the treatment of young permanent teeth with chronic periapical periodontitis. A prospective clinical study.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Dragana Rakasevic, Jelena Marinković, Jovan Marković, Biljana Nikolic, Dejan Markovic
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The study aimed at determining antibacterial efficiency of adjuvant photodynamic therapy (PDT) and high-power diode laser (DL) in the treatment of chronic periapical periodontitis (CPP) in young permanent teeth.
METHODS: Forty-four young permanent teeth with CPP were randomly divided into three groups (PDT, DL and control). Each tooth underwent standard chemo-mechanical treatment, while within tested groups was additionally treated by PDT or DL. Bacterial identification and quantification were provided by MALDI-TOF spectrometry and plate counting assay, performed after accessing the canal, following chemo-mechanical preparation, and after PDT or DL procedure where applicable.
RESULTS: Thirty-nine young permanent teeth with CCP (patients age 9.77 ± 1.43) completed the study. Before the treatments, 202 isolates belonging to 13 genera/species, including Streptococcus (36), Actinomyces (34), Peptostreptococcus micros (27), Veillonella (25) and Enterococcus faecalis (22), were recovered. Chemo-mechanical treatment reduced CFU count in the all three groups (p < 0.001), but complete eradication was not observed for any of isolated species. Adjuvant PDT and DL completely eradicated isolates of 8 and 6 bacterial genera/species, resulting in complete bacterial elimination from 53.8% and 30.8% of root canals, respectively. In the rest canals, total Δlog CFUs were 4.71 and 4.58.
CONCLUSION: The results indicated that both PDT and DL could be performed as adjuvants to standard endodontic treatment of the young permanent teeth with CPP.
METHODS: Forty-four young permanent teeth with CPP were randomly divided into three groups (PDT, DL and control). Each tooth underwent standard chemo-mechanical treatment, while within tested groups was additionally treated by PDT or DL. Bacterial identification and quantification were provided by MALDI-TOF spectrometry and plate counting assay, performed after accessing the canal, following chemo-mechanical preparation, and after PDT or DL procedure where applicable.
RESULTS: Thirty-nine young permanent teeth with CCP (patients age 9.77 ± 1.43) completed the study. Before the treatments, 202 isolates belonging to 13 genera/species, including Streptococcus (36), Actinomyces (34), Peptostreptococcus micros (27), Veillonella (25) and Enterococcus faecalis (22), were recovered. Chemo-mechanical treatment reduced CFU count in the all three groups (p < 0.001), but complete eradication was not observed for any of isolated species. Adjuvant PDT and DL completely eradicated isolates of 8 and 6 bacterial genera/species, resulting in complete bacterial elimination from 53.8% and 30.8% of root canals, respectively. In the rest canals, total Δlog CFUs were 4.71 and 4.58.
CONCLUSION: The results indicated that both PDT and DL could be performed as adjuvants to standard endodontic treatment of the young permanent teeth with CPP.