The Angle orthodontist · 2016
Dimensional changes of dental arches produced by fixed and removable palatal cribs: A prospective, randomized, controlled study.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Slaviero Thiago, Fernandes Thais Maria Freire, Oltramari-Navarro Paula Vanessa Pedron, de Castro Ana Claudia, Conti Ferreira, Poleti Marcelo Lupion, de Almeida Marcio Rodrigues
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the dimensional changes of dental arches on digital models of open bite treatment with fixed and removable palatal cribs.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The sample comprised 41 patients of both sexes who were white, aged 7-10 years, and who had mixed dentition, Angle Class I molar relationship, and a negative overbite of at least 1 mm. The sample was randomly divided into two groups: G1, fixed palatal crib; and G2, removable palatal crib. Cast models, obtained initially (T1) and after 1 year of treatment (T2), were scanned by a three-dimensional (3D) scanner, 3Shape R700, producing a 3D image. Measurements were performed by a calibrated examiner using OrthoAnalyzer™ 3D software.
RESULTS: At T2-T1, differences were observed between the groups regarding vertical dentoalveolar development and overjet. There was more mandibular incisor extrusion for G1 (-1.66 mm) than for G2 (-0.54 mm). An overjet increase was observed in G1 (0.56 mm), in contrast to a reduction in G2 (-0.40 mm). There was a similar overbite increase for both groups (3.51 mm for fixed palatal crib and 3.88 mm for removable palatal crib).
CONCLUSIONS: Both the treatment protocols are similarly effective for anterior open bite correction, providing an overbite increase with dentoalveolar arch changes, especially in the anterior region.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The sample comprised 41 patients of both sexes who were white, aged 7-10 years, and who had mixed dentition, Angle Class I molar relationship, and a negative overbite of at least 1 mm. The sample was randomly divided into two groups: G1, fixed palatal crib; and G2, removable palatal crib. Cast models, obtained initially (T1) and after 1 year of treatment (T2), were scanned by a three-dimensional (3D) scanner, 3Shape R700, producing a 3D image. Measurements were performed by a calibrated examiner using OrthoAnalyzer™ 3D software.
RESULTS: At T2-T1, differences were observed between the groups regarding vertical dentoalveolar development and overjet. There was more mandibular incisor extrusion for G1 (-1.66 mm) than for G2 (-0.54 mm). An overjet increase was observed in G1 (0.56 mm), in contrast to a reduction in G2 (-0.40 mm). There was a similar overbite increase for both groups (3.51 mm for fixed palatal crib and 3.88 mm for removable palatal crib).
CONCLUSIONS: Both the treatment protocols are similarly effective for anterior open bite correction, providing an overbite increase with dentoalveolar arch changes, especially in the anterior region.