The Laryngoscope · 2016
Clinical risk assessment model for pediatric obstructive sleep apnea.
СтатьяВалидационное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kang Kun-Tai, Weng Wen-Chin, Lee Chia-Hsuan, Hsiao Tzu-Yu, Lee Pei-Lin, Hsu Wei-Chung
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To develop a clinical risk prediction model that identifies children with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in a clinical setting by examining the symptoms, physical status, and OSA-18 questionnaire results.
DESIGN: Single institutional, cross-sectional study.
METHODS: Children aged 2 to 18 years with symptoms of OSA were enrolled. Pediatric OSA was diagnosed through full-night polysomnography. Clinical data, namely demographics, symptoms, OSA-18 survey results, tonsil and adenoid sizes, and the weight of each child, were examined for constructing a simple point-based clinical model for OSA prediction. Variables for the risk model were selected using multivariable logistic regression analyses.
RESULTS: Of the 310 participants (mean age, 7.6 ± 3.7 years; boys, 67%), 170 (55%) experienced OSA. Modeling variables were determined using several univariate logistic regression analyses, followed by multivariable logistic regression analyses. A point-based clinical model incorporating the age, tonsil size (5 points maximum), adenoid size (5 and 20 points for age > 6 years and < 6 years, respectively), obesity (5 points for age > 6 years), and breathing pauses (5 points) was developed (area under the curve = 0.832). Moreover, the optimal cutoff points for predicting the apnea-hypopnea index of > 1 and > 5 were 10 (sensitivity, 72.9%; specificity, 65.0%) and 12 (sensitivity, 77.5%; specificity, 56.9%), respectively. Internal validation using the bootstrap method revealed no apparent overfitting problem.
CONCLUSION: A novel clinical prediction model was developed for determining the risk of pediatric OSA; the model can be useful in identifying high-risk patients among those with sleep disturbances.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. Laryngoscope, 126:2403-2409, 2016.
DESIGN: Single institutional, cross-sectional study.
METHODS: Children aged 2 to 18 years with symptoms of OSA were enrolled. Pediatric OSA was diagnosed through full-night polysomnography. Clinical data, namely demographics, symptoms, OSA-18 survey results, tonsil and adenoid sizes, and the weight of each child, were examined for constructing a simple point-based clinical model for OSA prediction. Variables for the risk model were selected using multivariable logistic regression analyses.
RESULTS: Of the 310 participants (mean age, 7.6 ± 3.7 years; boys, 67%), 170 (55%) experienced OSA. Modeling variables were determined using several univariate logistic regression analyses, followed by multivariable logistic regression analyses. A point-based clinical model incorporating the age, tonsil size (5 points maximum), adenoid size (5 and 20 points for age > 6 years and < 6 years, respectively), obesity (5 points for age > 6 years), and breathing pauses (5 points) was developed (area under the curve = 0.832). Moreover, the optimal cutoff points for predicting the apnea-hypopnea index of > 1 and > 5 were 10 (sensitivity, 72.9%; specificity, 65.0%) and 12 (sensitivity, 77.5%; specificity, 56.9%), respectively. Internal validation using the bootstrap method revealed no apparent overfitting problem.
CONCLUSION: A novel clinical prediction model was developed for determining the risk of pediatric OSA; the model can be useful in identifying high-risk patients among those with sleep disturbances.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. Laryngoscope, 126:2403-2409, 2016.