The Effect of the Status of the Ossicular Chain and Choice of Graft Material on Hearing Outcomes in Pediatric Cholesteatoma Surgery.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
Compare hearing benefit of incus preservation in primary cholesteatoma surgery versus cartilage-myringostapediopexy.
METHODS
Prospective cohort study in a tertiary referral center. Tympanoplasty utilizing cartilage or other grafts, with or without intact incus was performed in 195 ears (187 children) with intact stapes. Outcome measures were pre and post-operative four-tone air conduction (AC) threshold (0.5, 1, 2, 4 kHz) and proportion with normal hearing (AC ≤ 30 dB HL) at 12 months.
RESULTS
Ears with intact ossicles had better post-operative AC thresholds than those with incus eroded or removed (median 20 dB HL vs. 30 dB HL, Mann-Whitney P < .001). The normal hearing rate was 81/106 (74%) with intact incus and 46/89 (52%) without (Fisher's exact P = .001). Ears without intact incus and a cartilage-myringostapediopexy had better post-operative thresholds than those with a non-cartilage graft (28.8 dB HL vs. 36.3 dB HL, Mann-Whitney P = .005). Of ears without intact incus, 37/59 (63%) with a cartilage-myringostapediopexy and 9/30 (30%) with a non-cartilage graft had normal hearing post-operatively (Fisher's exact P = .007). By preserving the incus in 12 ears, 1 more ear would have normal hearing than with incus removal plus cartilage-myringostapediopexy (NNT = 12 (CI 3.6-); Fisher's exact = 0.1).
CONCLUSION
Preserving an intact ossicular chain conveys a small but significant hearing benefit in cholesteatoma surgery, the magnitude of which should be considered before deciding to remove the intact incus. Cartilage-myringostapediopexy provides a significant gain in hearing when the incus is absent, even without a partial ossicular replacement prosthesis.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.