MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1309/k1xj-6cxr-bqqu-v255

Медицинская библиотека · American journal of clinical pathology · 2001

Ewing sarcoma vs lymphoblastic lymphoma. A comparative immunohistochemical study.

Lucas D R, Bentley G, Dan M E, Tabaczka P, Poulik J M, Mott M P

Клинический случайСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

To develop a practical immunohistochemistry panel for distinguishing lymphoblastic lymphoma from Ewing sarcoma (ES), we evaluated 17 ES and 27 lymphoblastic lymphoma and leukemia cases with antibodies to CD99, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT), leukocyte common antigen (LCA), CD43, CD79a, CD20, CD3, vimentin, and neuron-specific enolase (NSE). Three cases were bone lymphomas, 2 initially misdiagnosed as ES. All cases were CD99+. All lymphomas and leukemias were TdT+ compared to none of the ESs. None of the ESs expressed other lymphocytic markers, which were inconsistently expressed in the lymphomas and leukemias: CD43, 33%; LCA, 30%; CD79a, 19%; CD3, 19%; and CD20, 7%. Of the ESs, 88% were vimentin positive compared with 23% of lymphomas and leukemias. Vimentin was stronger and more diffuse in ES. NSE did not reliably stain any cases. When faced with the differential diagnosis of ES vs lymphoblastic lymphoma, an immunohistochemical panel that includes antibodies to CD99 and TdT is useful. Both epitopes are well preserved in fixed and decalcified tissue. A panel composed of antibodies to CD99 and TdT, in conjunction with other lymphocytic markers and vimentin, is highly sensitive and specific.

Для цитирования: Lucas D R, Bentley G, Dan M E, Tabaczka P, Poulik J M, Mott M P. Ewing sarcoma vs lymphoblastic lymphoma. A comparative immunohistochemical study.. American journal of clinical pathology. 2001. DOI: 10.1309/k1xj-6cxr-bqqu-v255.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.