Comparison of seven bio- and chemiluminescent reagents for in situ detection of antigens and nucleic acids.

Bio- and chemiluminescence have proved sensitive enough to compete with chromogenic and radioisotopic tracers for in situ detection. However, they must also provide a discriminant morphological analysis of the specific signal. We have tested seven bio- or chemiluminescent reagents for tissue antigen and nucleic acid detection by immunocytochemistry (ICC) or in situ hybridization (ISH). They were based on luminescent detection of peroxidase, alkaline phosphatase, beta-galactosidase or xanthine oxidase. We also explored whether high molecular weight polymers could increase the spatial definition of the photon emission. An ICCD camera was used to collect the light signal provided by immunolabelling of endothelial cells and by ISH of human papilloma virus on cell smears. Among the enzyme-luminescent substrate combinations tested, the enhanced luminol chemiluminescence (ECL) gave the best resolution of the specific signal. The other systems were mainly hampered by a high diffusion of the reaction product over the tissue section. Unfortunately, in this case, the high molecular weight polymers tested were inefficient. However, the addition of polyvinylalcohol (PVA) or polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) significantly improved respectively the definition and intensity of ECL photon emission. We demonstrate that chemiluminescence gives a morphological resolution allowing histological examination. The extension of this new application, now depends on physicochemical adaptation of chemiluminescent reagents to the constraints of tissue detection.