MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/jso.24392

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of surgical oncology · 2016

Recurrent pleomorphic adenoma of the parotid gland: Institutional experience and review of the literature.

Abu-Ghanem Yasmin, Mizrachi Aviram, Popovtzer Aron, Abu-Ghanem Nora, Feinmesser Raphael

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Recurrent pleomorphic adenoma (PA) of the parotid gland is a challenging surgical issue with controversy regarding management and long term outcome.

METHODS

All patients who were operated for recurrent PA of the parotid gland between the years 1991 and 2013 were reviewed. Patient demographics, clinicopathologic variables, and operative details were collected retrospectively.

RESULTS

A total of 22 patients were operated for recurrent PA of the parotid gland. Mean interval between recurrences was 7 and 6 years for first recurrence and second recurrence, accordingly. Second recurrence was significantly influenced by younger age at initial treatment (P = 0.009). Only two patients (9%) with a recurrence developed facial nerve paralysis following surgery. Adjuvant radiotherapy was given to nine patients with no evidence of disease progression or recurrence. There were no cases of malignant transformation.

CONCLUSIONS

Recurrent PA of the parotid gland tends to occur in long intervals in a multifocal pattern. Adjuvant radiotherapy could be suggested as an alternative for surgery. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;114:714-718. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Для цитирования: Abu-Ghanem Yasmin, Mizrachi Aviram, Popovtzer Aron, Abu-Ghanem Nora, Feinmesser Raphael. Recurrent pleomorphic adenoma of the parotid gland: Institutional experience and review of the literature.. Journal of surgical oncology. 2016. DOI: 10.1002/jso.24392.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.