Brain stimulation · 2023
Functional connectivity explains how neuronavigated TMS of posterior temporal subregions differentially affect language processing.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Vasileiadi Maria, Schuler Anna-Lisa, Woletz Michael, Linhardt David, Windischberger Christian, Tik Martin
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: "Wernicke's area" is most often used to describe the posterior superior temporal gyrus (STG) and refers to a region traditionally thought to support language comprehension. However, the posterior STG additionally plays a critical role in language production. The purpose of the current study was to determine to what extent regions within the posterior STG are selectively recruited during language production.
METHODS: 23 healthy right-handed participants completed an auditory fMRI localizer task, resting-state fMRI and underwent neuronavigated TMS language mapping. We applied repetitive TMS bursts during a picture naming paradigm to probe speech disruptions of different categories (anomia, speech arrest, semantic paraphasia and phonological paraphasia). We combined an in-house built high precision stimulation software suite with E-field modeling to map the naming errors to cortical regions and revealed a dissociation of language functions within the temporal gyrus. Resting state fMRI was used to explain how E-field peaks of different categories differentially affected language production.
RESULTS: Peaks for phonological and semantic errors were found in the STG while those for anomia and speech arrest were located in the MTG. Seed-based connectivity analysis revealed a local connectivity pattern for phonological and semantic errors, while anomia and speech arrest seeds resulted in a larger network between IFG and posterior MTG.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides important insights into the functional neuroanatomy of language production and might help to increase the current understanding of specific language production difficulties on a causal level.
METHODS: 23 healthy right-handed participants completed an auditory fMRI localizer task, resting-state fMRI and underwent neuronavigated TMS language mapping. We applied repetitive TMS bursts during a picture naming paradigm to probe speech disruptions of different categories (anomia, speech arrest, semantic paraphasia and phonological paraphasia). We combined an in-house built high precision stimulation software suite with E-field modeling to map the naming errors to cortical regions and revealed a dissociation of language functions within the temporal gyrus. Resting state fMRI was used to explain how E-field peaks of different categories differentially affected language production.
RESULTS: Peaks for phonological and semantic errors were found in the STG while those for anomia and speech arrest were located in the MTG. Seed-based connectivity analysis revealed a local connectivity pattern for phonological and semantic errors, while anomia and speech arrest seeds resulted in a larger network between IFG and posterior MTG.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides important insights into the functional neuroanatomy of language production and might help to increase the current understanding of specific language production difficulties on a causal level.