Brachytherapy · 2024
Dosimetric evaluation of adaptive planning for five-fraction gynecologic template-based interstitial brachytherapy.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Blum Steven, Miller Jessica R, Bradley Kristin A, Anderson Bethany, Menon Hari, Eckelmann Bradley, Wallace Charles, Besemer Abby, Lawless Michael, Slagowski Jordan M
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The purpose of this work was to evaluate whether inter-fraction imaging and replanning enhance treatment delivery adherence to clinical planning objectives in the context of a 5-fraction template-based interstitial brachytherapy (TISB) approach for gynecologic cancer treatment.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: This retrospective study analyzed nineteen patients who underwent 5 fractions of interstitial brachytherapy over 3 days using the Syed-Neblett template. A verification CT scan was acquired for applicator assessment and reviewed by a radiation oncologist and medical physicist before each fraction. Eleven patients required replanning at least once during the treatment course. Replanning on the verification CT scan consisted of generating new target and organ-at-risk contours, digitizing catheter positions, and optimizing source dwell times to meet planning objectives. Dwell times and positions from the initial treatment plan were evaluated on the new contours to assess the dose that would have been delivered without replanning (nonadapted). Significance of nonadapted versus adapted dose differences were evaluated using a 2-sided Wilcoxon sum rank test.
RESULTS: The average (min, max) change in dose (Gy) between the clinically delivered plans and the nonadapted plans were HR-CTV D90%: -6.5 (-0.6, -15.1), HR-CTV D98%: -6.5 (-0.4, -12.6), Bladder D2cc: -0.5 (0.0, -2.8), Bowel D2cc: -0.8 (0.0, -3.2), Rectum D2cc: -1.1 (0.0, -11.5), Sigmoid D2cc: -1.4 (-0.1, -5.4). Dosimetric changes in HR-CTV coverage were significantly improved with replanning while organ-at-risk differences were nonsignificant (p > 0.05). Fraction 3 was the most common fraction indicated for replanning.
CONCLUSIONS: Replanning template-based interstitial brachytherapy can improve target coverage and adherence to planning goals.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: This retrospective study analyzed nineteen patients who underwent 5 fractions of interstitial brachytherapy over 3 days using the Syed-Neblett template. A verification CT scan was acquired for applicator assessment and reviewed by a radiation oncologist and medical physicist before each fraction. Eleven patients required replanning at least once during the treatment course. Replanning on the verification CT scan consisted of generating new target and organ-at-risk contours, digitizing catheter positions, and optimizing source dwell times to meet planning objectives. Dwell times and positions from the initial treatment plan were evaluated on the new contours to assess the dose that would have been delivered without replanning (nonadapted). Significance of nonadapted versus adapted dose differences were evaluated using a 2-sided Wilcoxon sum rank test.
RESULTS: The average (min, max) change in dose (Gy) between the clinically delivered plans and the nonadapted plans were HR-CTV D90%: -6.5 (-0.6, -15.1), HR-CTV D98%: -6.5 (-0.4, -12.6), Bladder D2cc: -0.5 (0.0, -2.8), Bowel D2cc: -0.8 (0.0, -3.2), Rectum D2cc: -1.1 (0.0, -11.5), Sigmoid D2cc: -1.4 (-0.1, -5.4). Dosimetric changes in HR-CTV coverage were significantly improved with replanning while organ-at-risk differences were nonsignificant (p > 0.05). Fraction 3 was the most common fraction indicated for replanning.
CONCLUSIONS: Replanning template-based interstitial brachytherapy can improve target coverage and adherence to planning goals.