American journal of clinical oncology · 2013
ACR Appropriateness Criteria® management of locoregionally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Expert Panel on Radiation Oncology-Gynecology, Kidd Elizabeth, Moore David, Varia Mahesh A, Gaffney David K, Elshaikh Mohamed A, Erickson Beth, Jhingran Anuja, Lee Larissa J, Mayr Nina A, Puthawala Ajmel A, Rao Gautam G, Small William, Wahl Andrew O, Wolfson Aaron H, Yashar Catheryn M, Yuh William, Cardenes Higinia Rosa
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Locoregionally advanced vulvar cancer (LRAVC) is a rare disease that presents many challenging medical decisions. An expert panel was convened to reach consensus on the most appropriate pretreatment assessment and therapeutic interventions in LRAVC patients.
METHODS: The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidenced-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 2 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journal and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances where evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to formulate recommendations.
RESULTS: Three clinical variants were developed to address common scenarios in the management of LRAVC. Group members reached consensus on the appropriateness of specific evaluation and treatment approaches, with numerical ratings and descriptive commentary.
CONCLUSIONS: In combining available medical literature and expert opinion, this manuscript may serve as an aid for other practitioners in the appropriate management of patients with LRAVC.
METHODS: The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidenced-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 2 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journal and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances where evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to formulate recommendations.
RESULTS: Three clinical variants were developed to address common scenarios in the management of LRAVC. Group members reached consensus on the appropriateness of specific evaluation and treatment approaches, with numerical ratings and descriptive commentary.
CONCLUSIONS: In combining available medical literature and expert opinion, this manuscript may serve as an aid for other practitioners in the appropriate management of patients with LRAVC.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Carcinoma, Squamous CellChemoradiotherapyDiagnostic ImagingEvidence-Based MedicineFemaleHumansLymph Node ExcisionLymphatic MetastasisMultimodal ImagingNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm StagingPositron-Emission TomographyPractice Guidelines as TopicPrognosisSocieties, MedicalSurvival AnalysisTomography, X-Ray ComputedTreatment OutcomeVulvar Neoplasms