Sexually transmitted diseases · 2020
For Human Papillomavirus Self-Sampling, Stated Willingness Does Not Correspond With Subsequent Uptake by Rural Malawian Women.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hood Robert B, Turner Abigail Norris, Huber-Krum Sarah, Lancaster Kathryn E, Mwapasa Victor, Poindexter Tiara, Nampandeni Patrick, Esber Allahna, Norris Alison H
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Human papilloma virus (HPV), the causative agent for cervical cancer, can be tested for using self-collected vaginal samples. Self-collection is promising for HPV screening in hard-to-reach populations. To assess the relationship between willingness to self-collect and subsequent uptake of self-collection, we conducted a longitudinal study of reproductive-age women in rural Malawi.
METHODS: At baseline, we asked women if they would be willing to self-collect a vaginal sample for HPV testing. At follow-up (12-18 months later), we offered the same women the opportunity to self-collect a sample for HPV testing. We examined unadjusted and adjusted associations between baseline willingness to self-collect a sample for HPV testing and uptake of self-collection at follow-up using log-binomial models.
RESULTS: Among 122 women who, at baseline, indicated willingness to self-collect, n = 65 (53%) agreed to self-collect a sample at follow-up. Of 64 women who stated unwillingness at baseline to self-collect, n = 30 (47%) self-collected a sample for testing at follow-up. We observed no association between women's willingness at baseline and their observed self-collection decision at follow-up (unadjusted prevalence ratio, 1.14; 95% confidence interval, 0.83-1.55). The association remained null after adjustment for age, awareness of cervical cancer, and perceived behavioral control.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that evaluation of acceptability of self-collection should go beyond simply asking women if they would be willing to self-collect a vaginal sample. Given that half of this study's participants agreed to self-collect a sample when the opportunity was offered, regardless of their previously stated preferences, self-collection should be offered to everyone.
METHODS: At baseline, we asked women if they would be willing to self-collect a vaginal sample for HPV testing. At follow-up (12-18 months later), we offered the same women the opportunity to self-collect a sample for HPV testing. We examined unadjusted and adjusted associations between baseline willingness to self-collect a sample for HPV testing and uptake of self-collection at follow-up using log-binomial models.
RESULTS: Among 122 women who, at baseline, indicated willingness to self-collect, n = 65 (53%) agreed to self-collect a sample at follow-up. Of 64 women who stated unwillingness at baseline to self-collect, n = 30 (47%) self-collected a sample for testing at follow-up. We observed no association between women's willingness at baseline and their observed self-collection decision at follow-up (unadjusted prevalence ratio, 1.14; 95% confidence interval, 0.83-1.55). The association remained null after adjustment for age, awareness of cervical cancer, and perceived behavioral control.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that evaluation of acceptability of self-collection should go beyond simply asking women if they would be willing to self-collect a vaginal sample. Given that half of this study's participants agreed to self-collect a sample when the opportunity was offered, regardless of their previously stated preferences, self-collection should be offered to everyone.