Neuroscience letters · 2020
Mechanism differences between typical yin and typical yang personality individuals assessed by Five-Pattern Personality Inventory (FPPI): Evidence from resting-state brain functional networks.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Li Xiaozhen, Zhuo Chuanjun, Guo Hao, Du Jian, Wang Hao, Wang Junjie, Li Jing, Zhao Wentao, Li Yao, Sun Chao, Zhang Jingfang, Yang Qiuli, Xu Yong
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Most studies assessing brain-personality mechanisms have used Western personality questionnaires. However, Western personality questionnaires may not objectively reflect the personality characteristics of individuals in Eastern cultures such as China. Hence, we adopted the functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and the Chinese localized scale, FPPI, to explore the brain mechanisms differences of typical yin and typical yang personalities of individuals in China.
METHODS: 30 typical yin personality participants (TYI) and 34 typical yang personality participants (TYA) were enrolled according to the FPPI. The group differences of the functional brain networks among 90 specific brain regions were mapped using fMRI data and then analyzed by the conventional network metrics (CNM) and frequency subgraph mining (FSM).
RESULTS: The CNM and FSM differences between two typical personality groups were traced to the frontal, temporal, and parietal cortices. The yin group, reflecting the rich emotions and feelings of individuals, showed higher betweenness centrality (BCi) and nodal efficiency (Ei) values in putamen and middle frontal gyrus. The yang group, reflecting active behaviors and tendency to adapting to the changing surroundings, showed higher BCi and Ei values in precuneus, posterior cingulate gyrus, and inferior parietal lobule, brain areas in the default mode network (DMN).
CONCLUSION: These results supplied evidence for the neurobiological differences between typical yin and typical yang personality participants based on Chinese culture. These results also provide a new perspective to help researchers understand brain mechanism differences between yin and yang personality groups in the Chinese culture.
METHODS: 30 typical yin personality participants (TYI) and 34 typical yang personality participants (TYA) were enrolled according to the FPPI. The group differences of the functional brain networks among 90 specific brain regions were mapped using fMRI data and then analyzed by the conventional network metrics (CNM) and frequency subgraph mining (FSM).
RESULTS: The CNM and FSM differences between two typical personality groups were traced to the frontal, temporal, and parietal cortices. The yin group, reflecting the rich emotions and feelings of individuals, showed higher betweenness centrality (BCi) and nodal efficiency (Ei) values in putamen and middle frontal gyrus. The yang group, reflecting active behaviors and tendency to adapting to the changing surroundings, showed higher BCi and Ei values in precuneus, posterior cingulate gyrus, and inferior parietal lobule, brain areas in the default mode network (DMN).
CONCLUSION: These results supplied evidence for the neurobiological differences between typical yin and typical yang personality participants based on Chinese culture. These results also provide a new perspective to help researchers understand brain mechanism differences between yin and yang personality groups in the Chinese culture.