Seizure · 2024
Cerebellar atrophy in genetic epileptic encephalopathies: A cohort study and a systematic review.
СтатьяСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yang Yao-Lun, Lee Hsiu-Fen, Chi Ching-Shiang, Tsai Chi-Ren, Wu Pei-Yu, Liu Shu-Ning
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To analyze cerebellar atrophy in genetic epileptic encephalopathies (EEs).
METHODS: This research included a retrospective cohort study conducted from January 2016 to December 2023 and a systematic review on cerebellar atrophy in genetic EEs. Pediatric individuals who were diagnosed with EEs based on electroclinical features, carried causative gene variants, and exhibited cerebellar atrophy were recruited. Electroclinical features, neuroimaging findings, and causative variants of eligible individuals were analyzed.
RESULTS: The cohort study showed 10 of 67 pediatric individuals (10/67; 15 %) who were diagnosed with genetic EEs had cerebellar atrophy; and 6 of the 10 individuals (6/10; 60 %) exhibited cerebellar signs. Diagnostic delay between the detection of cerebellar atrophy and the identification of genetic diagnosis existed in 6 individuals (6/10; 60 %) and the median duration was 4.4 years. A total of 32 genes, including 31 genes from the literature review and a newly identified SCN2A gene in this cohort, were reported associated with cerebellar atrophy in genetic EEs. Twenty-six genes (26/32; 81 %) accounted for cerebellar atrophy associated with other brain anomalies and 6 genes (6/32; 19 %) caused isolated cerebellar atrophy. Twenty-five genes (25/32; 78 %) showed late-onset cerebellar atrophy identified after the age of 1 year old.
CONCLUSION: Cerebellar atrophy is not uncommon in genetic EEs and may serve as an indicator for molecular diagnosis in clinical practice. To shorten the diagnostic delay, follow-up neuroimaging study is crucial because of high rate of clinico-radiological dissociation and late-onset cerebellar atrophy in this patient group.
METHODS: This research included a retrospective cohort study conducted from January 2016 to December 2023 and a systematic review on cerebellar atrophy in genetic EEs. Pediatric individuals who were diagnosed with EEs based on electroclinical features, carried causative gene variants, and exhibited cerebellar atrophy were recruited. Electroclinical features, neuroimaging findings, and causative variants of eligible individuals were analyzed.
RESULTS: The cohort study showed 10 of 67 pediatric individuals (10/67; 15 %) who were diagnosed with genetic EEs had cerebellar atrophy; and 6 of the 10 individuals (6/10; 60 %) exhibited cerebellar signs. Diagnostic delay between the detection of cerebellar atrophy and the identification of genetic diagnosis existed in 6 individuals (6/10; 60 %) and the median duration was 4.4 years. A total of 32 genes, including 31 genes from the literature review and a newly identified SCN2A gene in this cohort, were reported associated with cerebellar atrophy in genetic EEs. Twenty-six genes (26/32; 81 %) accounted for cerebellar atrophy associated with other brain anomalies and 6 genes (6/32; 19 %) caused isolated cerebellar atrophy. Twenty-five genes (25/32; 78 %) showed late-onset cerebellar atrophy identified after the age of 1 year old.
CONCLUSION: Cerebellar atrophy is not uncommon in genetic EEs and may serve as an indicator for molecular diagnosis in clinical practice. To shorten the diagnostic delay, follow-up neuroimaging study is crucial because of high rate of clinico-radiological dissociation and late-onset cerebellar atrophy in this patient group.