The New Zealand medical journal · 2019
Acceptability of human papillomavirus self-sampling for cervical-cancer screening in under-screened Māori and Pasifika women: a pilot study.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Brewer Naomi, Foliaki Sunia, Bromhead Collette, Viliamu-Amusia Ioana, Pelefoti-Gibson Litia, Jones Tegan, Pearce Neil, Potter John D, Douwes Jeroen
Аннотация
AIM: To assess whether self-sampling for cervical-cancer screening is acceptable to New Zealand women.
METHODS: Māori, Pacific and Asian un- or under-screened women aged 30-69 years were asked to: 1) examine three self-sampling devices; 2) complete a questionnaire on demographics and experiences with the devices; and 3) take a self-sample. Samples were tested 'off-label' using the cobas® 4800 human papillomavirus (HPV) test (Roche Diagnostics NZ).
RESULTS: Thirty-one Pacific, 12 Māori, nine Asian and four women of other ethnicities participated (mean age, 39.5 years). Before trying any devices, 78% indicated a preference to self-sample, compared to 22% who preferred a physician-collected sample (PCS). After trying a device (HerSwab™, 91%; Delphi Screener™, 14%; cobas Swab, 13%; 12.5% used >1 device), fewer women (66%) preferred to self-sample next time, fewer (16%) preferred a PCS, while 18% expressed no preference. One of 32 samples with valid results (35 were tested) was positive for HPV 'other' oncogenic types.
CONCLUSIONS: This was the first New Zealand study to invite women, including Māori women, to take a self-sample for cervical-cancer screening. The pilot study suggests that un- and under-screened women generally find self-sampling acceptable and all sample types are suitable for use with the cobas HPV test.
METHODS: Māori, Pacific and Asian un- or under-screened women aged 30-69 years were asked to: 1) examine three self-sampling devices; 2) complete a questionnaire on demographics and experiences with the devices; and 3) take a self-sample. Samples were tested 'off-label' using the cobas® 4800 human papillomavirus (HPV) test (Roche Diagnostics NZ).
RESULTS: Thirty-one Pacific, 12 Māori, nine Asian and four women of other ethnicities participated (mean age, 39.5 years). Before trying any devices, 78% indicated a preference to self-sample, compared to 22% who preferred a physician-collected sample (PCS). After trying a device (HerSwab™, 91%; Delphi Screener™, 14%; cobas Swab, 13%; 12.5% used >1 device), fewer women (66%) preferred to self-sample next time, fewer (16%) preferred a PCS, while 18% expressed no preference. One of 32 samples with valid results (35 were tested) was positive for HPV 'other' oncogenic types.
CONCLUSIONS: This was the first New Zealand study to invite women, including Māori women, to take a self-sample for cervical-cancer screening. The pilot study suggests that un- and under-screened women generally find self-sampling acceptable and all sample types are suitable for use with the cobas HPV test.