On the art of anastomotic posterior urethroplasty: a 27-year experience.

PURPOSE: We determined the various operative details of anastomotic posterior urethroplasty that are essential for a successful result.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of 155 patients who had undergone anastomotic repair of posterior urethral strictures or distraction defects between 1977 and 2003. Patient age ranged from 3 to 58 years (mean 21) and all except 1 had sustained a pelvic fracture urethral injury as the initial causative trauma. Repair was performed with a perineal procedure in 113 patients, elaborated perineal in 2 and perineo-abdominal in 40. Followup ranged from 1 to 22 years.

RESULTS

The results were successful in 104 (90%) cases after perineal (including 2 elaborated perineal) and in 39 (98%) after perineo-abdominal repair. Successful results were sustained for up to 22 years after surgery. Urinary incontinence did not develop in any patients while 2 lost potency as a direct result of anastomotic surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Of the operative details 3 constitute the gold triad that assures a successful outcome, namely complete excision of scarred tissues, fixation of healthy mucosa of the 2 urethral ends and creation of a tension-free anastomosis. When the bulboprostatic urethral gap is 2.5 cm or less, restoration of urethral continuity may be accomplished with a perineal procedure after liberal mobilization of the bulbar urethra. For defects of 2.5 cm or greater the elaborated perineal or perineo-abdominal transpubic procedure should be used. In the presence of a competent bladder neck, anastomotic surgery does not result in urinary incontinence. Impotence is usually related to the original trauma and rarely (2%) to urethroplasty itself.