Unmasking the "Mixed-Dysregulated" phenotype: latent profiles of affective temperaments and non-suicidal self-injury in adolescents with depression.

BACKGROUND

Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) is highly prevalent among adolescents with depression, yet the heterogeneity of underlying temperamental risk factors remains poorly understood. Traditional variable-centered approaches fail to capture how distinct affective temperaments co-occur within individuals. This study aimed to identify latent profiles of affective temperaments and examine their association with NSSI, exploring the statistical mediating role of cognitive emotion regulation (CER).

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted from February 2025 to September 2025 at the First Hospital of Hebei Medical University. A total of 290 adolescents (aged 10–19) diagnosed with Major Depressive Disorder were recruited, with 282 valid responses included in the final analysis. Participants completed the TEMPS-A, CERQ, and ASHS. Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) was utilized to identify temperament subgroups. Mediation analysis with bootstrapping was performed to test the indirect effects of CER strategies.

RESULTS

LPA identified three distinct profiles: Resilient/Low-risk (Class 1, 32.6%), Anxious-Depressive (Class 2, 46.1%), and Mixed-Dysregulated (Class 3, 21.3%). The Mixed-Dysregulated group, characterized by simultaneous elevations in depressive, anxious, irritable, and cyclothymic temperaments, exhibited the highest frequency (45.2 ± 21.3 times/year) and prevalence (98.8%) of NSSI compared to other groups (p <.001). Mediation analysis revealed that the impact of the high-risk profile on NSSI was significantly mediated by maladaptive CER strategies, specifically catastrophizing and rumination.

CONCLUSION

The findings delineate a specific “Mixed-Dysregulated” risk phenotype within adolescent depression that is associated with severe NSSI. Interventions should move beyond standard depression care to target cognitive flexibility and emotional regulation skills. Statistical mediation analysis suggests that this risk is mediated by maladaptive cognitive emotion regulation strategies. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.