European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2019
Healing acceleration of mastoidectomy through the external auditory canal incisionless approach.
Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lee Jun Ho
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate a surgical procedure of canal wall-up mastoidectomy without incision of the canal which enables accelerated healing and enhances hearing outcome.
METHODS: A total of 79 patients were enrolled. A canal-incisionless technique was used in 37 patients undergoing canal wall-up/down mastoidectomy (CWU/DM), explo-mastoidectomy, and cochlea implantation as staged operation after obliteration of the mastoid, and canal incision was used in the remaining 42 patients as comparison group.
RESULTS: Preoperative and postoperative pure tone audiometry/word recognition score and postoperative status including the healing time and complications were analyzed. Healing time of the canal-incisionless procedure (2.7 weeks) was shorter than that of conventional mastoidectomy with canal incision (5.7 weeks). Complication rate of the canal-incisionless procedure was lower than that of canal incision approach, even though statistical meaningless.
CONCLUSION: Despite the small sample size of our study, in patients undergoing CWDM, explo-mastoidectomy, and cochlea implantation, more acceptable healing was achieved using the canal-incisionless technique than with the canal incision technique. CWU/DM without canal incision is useful to achieve optimal surgical view, eliminate pathology of the middle ear, and accelerate healing time.
METHODS: A total of 79 patients were enrolled. A canal-incisionless technique was used in 37 patients undergoing canal wall-up/down mastoidectomy (CWU/DM), explo-mastoidectomy, and cochlea implantation as staged operation after obliteration of the mastoid, and canal incision was used in the remaining 42 patients as comparison group.
RESULTS: Preoperative and postoperative pure tone audiometry/word recognition score and postoperative status including the healing time and complications were analyzed. Healing time of the canal-incisionless procedure (2.7 weeks) was shorter than that of conventional mastoidectomy with canal incision (5.7 weeks). Complication rate of the canal-incisionless procedure was lower than that of canal incision approach, even though statistical meaningless.
CONCLUSION: Despite the small sample size of our study, in patients undergoing CWDM, explo-mastoidectomy, and cochlea implantation, more acceptable healing was achieved using the canal-incisionless technique than with the canal incision technique. CWU/DM without canal incision is useful to achieve optimal surgical view, eliminate pathology of the middle ear, and accelerate healing time.