Hepato-gastroenterology · 2012
Pancreatic injury in children: review of 7 cases and the pertinent literature.
Клинический случайСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yamana Ippei, Kawamoto Shunji, Kamitani Takanori, Ishikura Hiroyasu, Yamashita Yuichi
Аннотация
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Treatment of blunt injury of the pancreas in children remains controversial. Some prefer non-surgical treatment, whereas others prefer surgical management in selected cases. This report reviews our management strategies of children with blunt pancreatic trauma and their outcomes.
METHODOLOGY: Medical records of 7 children with traumatic pancreatic injury were retrospectively analyzed in our institutions. In addition, we reviewed the pertinent literature.
RESULTS: There were 2 males and 5 females with a median age of 7.6 years. Pancreatic injury was classified in 3 patients as grade I, in 2 patients as grade II, and in 2 patients as grade III (AAST). The two grade III children underwent ERCP preoperatively. ERCP showed injury to the main pancreatic duct in both of these patients, and emergency surgery was performed for both of them. These operative methods were spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy and only drainage at the margin of the pancreas with non-resection, respectively. All 7 cases survived.
CONCLUSIONS: ERCP is helpful for the diagnosis of suspected cases in pancreatic injury with grade III. In hemorrhagic shock state, appropriate surgical procedures with only drainage at the margin of the pancreas are useful for the treatment of pancreatic fistula in children.
METHODOLOGY: Medical records of 7 children with traumatic pancreatic injury were retrospectively analyzed in our institutions. In addition, we reviewed the pertinent literature.
RESULTS: There were 2 males and 5 females with a median age of 7.6 years. Pancreatic injury was classified in 3 patients as grade I, in 2 patients as grade II, and in 2 patients as grade III (AAST). The two grade III children underwent ERCP preoperatively. ERCP showed injury to the main pancreatic duct in both of these patients, and emergency surgery was performed for both of them. These operative methods were spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy and only drainage at the margin of the pancreas with non-resection, respectively. All 7 cases survived.
CONCLUSIONS: ERCP is helpful for the diagnosis of suspected cases in pancreatic injury with grade III. In hemorrhagic shock state, appropriate surgical procedures with only drainage at the margin of the pancreas are useful for the treatment of pancreatic fistula in children.