Journal of pediatric surgery · 2016
Sentinel lymph node biopsy is a prognostic measure in pediatric melanoma.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kim Jina, Sun Zhifei, Gulack Brian C, Adam Mohamed A, Mosca Paul J, Rice Henry E, Tracy Elisabeth T
Аннотация
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB)-based management has been shown to improve disease-free survival in adult melanoma, but there is scant evidence regarding the utility of SLNB in pediatric melanoma.
METHODS: The 2004-2011 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was queried for patients with primary cutaneous melanoma of Breslow depth>0.75mm and clinically negative nodes. Pediatric patients, defined as less than 20years of age, were grouped by whether they underwent SLNB or not. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to compare melanoma-specific survival (MSS) in propensity-matched groups.
RESULTS: 310 pediatric patients met study criteria: 261 (84%) underwent SLNB, while 49 (16%) did not. There was no difference in MSS between matched children who received SLNB and those who did not (p=0.36). Among children who received SLNB, a positive SLNB was associated with worse MSS compared to a negative SLNB (89% vs. 100% at 84months, p=0.04). However, children with a positive SLNB had more favorable survival compared to patients >20years of age (88% vs. 66% at 84months, p=0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: SLNB does not confer a survival benefit to children with melanoma, but it provides valuable prognostic information regarding MSS.
METHODS: The 2004-2011 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was queried for patients with primary cutaneous melanoma of Breslow depth>0.75mm and clinically negative nodes. Pediatric patients, defined as less than 20years of age, were grouped by whether they underwent SLNB or not. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to compare melanoma-specific survival (MSS) in propensity-matched groups.
RESULTS: 310 pediatric patients met study criteria: 261 (84%) underwent SLNB, while 49 (16%) did not. There was no difference in MSS between matched children who received SLNB and those who did not (p=0.36). Among children who received SLNB, a positive SLNB was associated with worse MSS compared to a negative SLNB (89% vs. 100% at 84months, p=0.04). However, children with a positive SLNB had more favorable survival compared to patients >20years of age (88% vs. 66% at 84months, p=0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: SLNB does not confer a survival benefit to children with melanoma, but it provides valuable prognostic information regarding MSS.