Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2014
[Outcomes of imatinib and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia].
Сравнительное исследованиеАннотация на английскомСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhou Min, Sha Xinshan, Qiu Huiying, He Guangsheng, Xu Yang, Cen Jiannong, Pan Jinlan, Chen Suning, Sun Aining, Zhang Ri, Wu Depei
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To compare the curative effect of imatinib and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT) in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML).
METHODS: 292 CML patients received imatinib, and 141 patients underwent allo-HSCT. The clinical data of these patients were retrospectively analyzed to compare event- free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) between these two groups of patients in chronic and advanced (including accelerate and blast) phases.
RESULTS: (1) EFS, OS, expected 5- year EFS and OS of imatinib group (278 patients in chronic phase) were all statistically higher than of allo-HSCT group (120 patients in chronic phase) (88.5% vs 70.0%, 93.2% vs 80.0%, 84.0% vs 75.0% and 92.0% vs 79.0%, respectively, all P values < 0.01). (2) EFS and OS of imatinib group (14 patients in accelerate and blast phases) were 42.9% and 42.9%, respectively. Meanwhile EFS and OS of allo-HSCT group (21 patients in accelerate and blast phases) were 47.6% and 57.1%, respectively. There were no significant differences in terms of EFS and OS between the two groups (P values>0.05).
CONCLUSION: EFS and OS of imatinib group were significantly higher than of allo-HSCT group for CML patients of in chronic phase. Imatinib and allo-HSCT had the similar efficacy for CML patients in accelerate and blast phases.
METHODS: 292 CML patients received imatinib, and 141 patients underwent allo-HSCT. The clinical data of these patients were retrospectively analyzed to compare event- free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) between these two groups of patients in chronic and advanced (including accelerate and blast) phases.
RESULTS: (1) EFS, OS, expected 5- year EFS and OS of imatinib group (278 patients in chronic phase) were all statistically higher than of allo-HSCT group (120 patients in chronic phase) (88.5% vs 70.0%, 93.2% vs 80.0%, 84.0% vs 75.0% and 92.0% vs 79.0%, respectively, all P values < 0.01). (2) EFS and OS of imatinib group (14 patients in accelerate and blast phases) were 42.9% and 42.9%, respectively. Meanwhile EFS and OS of allo-HSCT group (21 patients in accelerate and blast phases) were 47.6% and 57.1%, respectively. There were no significant differences in terms of EFS and OS between the two groups (P values>0.05).
CONCLUSION: EFS and OS of imatinib group were significantly higher than of allo-HSCT group for CML patients of in chronic phase. Imatinib and allo-HSCT had the similar efficacy for CML patients in accelerate and blast phases.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdolescentAdultAgedBenzamidesChildChild, PreschoolDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansImatinib MesylateLeukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL PositiveMaleMiddle AgedPiperazinesProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrimidinesRetrospective StudiesTransplantation, HomologousYoung Adult