Biological psychiatry · 1998
Distinguishing schizophrenic patients from healthy controls by quantitative measurement of eye movement parameters.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Arolt V, Teichert H M, Steege D, Lencer R, Heide W
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Eye tracking dysfunction is a putative trait marker for susceptibility to schizophrenia; however, it cannot be recommended as an additional tool for the diagnosis of schizophrenia, due to low sensitivity and specificity.
METHODS: To assess the diagnostic potentials of combinations of eye movement paradigms, four smooth pursuit experiments (1: constant velocity of 15 degrees/sec; 2 and 3: combination with either visual or auditory distractors; 4: constant velocity of 30 degrees/sec) and two saccadic eye movement experiments (1: reflexive saccades; 2: voluntary saccades) were conducted. Fourteen patients with residual schizophrenia and 17 healthy controls were studied. Two sets of discriminant analyses (each with the resubstitution and with the "leaving one out" method) were calculated.
RESULTS: In the first set, all 10 characteristic variables were included, whereas for the second set, the three most powerful parameters were selected (two from smooth pursuit tasks and one from a voluntary saccade experiment). This procedure provided the best classification results, regarding concordance between clinical diagnoses and eye movement dysfunction (kappa = .67-.80).
CONCLUSIONS: Schizophrenic patients of the residual subtype can be differentiated from healthy individuals with considerable criterion validity on the basis of paradigms from two different ocular motor systems.
METHODS: To assess the diagnostic potentials of combinations of eye movement paradigms, four smooth pursuit experiments (1: constant velocity of 15 degrees/sec; 2 and 3: combination with either visual or auditory distractors; 4: constant velocity of 30 degrees/sec) and two saccadic eye movement experiments (1: reflexive saccades; 2: voluntary saccades) were conducted. Fourteen patients with residual schizophrenia and 17 healthy controls were studied. Two sets of discriminant analyses (each with the resubstitution and with the "leaving one out" method) were calculated.
RESULTS: In the first set, all 10 characteristic variables were included, whereas for the second set, the three most powerful parameters were selected (two from smooth pursuit tasks and one from a voluntary saccade experiment). This procedure provided the best classification results, regarding concordance between clinical diagnoses and eye movement dysfunction (kappa = .67-.80).
CONCLUSIONS: Schizophrenic patients of the residual subtype can be differentiated from healthy individuals with considerable criterion validity on the basis of paradigms from two different ocular motor systems.